Infrastructure Management for Improved Learning Outcomes: Insights from Junior High Schools in Southwest Aceh, Indonesia

Authors

  • Dedi Istakri Graduate School of Education Administration, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Hizir Sofyan Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Ismail Ismail Graduate School of Education Administration, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v2i1.169

Keywords:

Facilities management, Infrastructure, Learning quality, School resource optimization, Learning environment

Abstract

This qualitative study explores the management of facilities and infrastructure at two junior high schools in Southwest Aceh Regency, Indonesia (SMP Negeri 1 Susoh and SMP Negeri 2 Susoh) and examines its impact on learning quality. The research methodology includes observations, structured interviews, and documentation to collect data from key stakeholders such as principals, deputy principals, and teachers. The findings emphasize the critical role of detailed planning and collaboration among teachers, principals, and school development teams in aligning facility needs with curriculum requirements. Efficient use, storage, maintenance, and care of educational assets are essential for maximizing their functionality and longevity. The study also highlights the importance of comprehensive inventory management that adheres to regulatory guidelines to ensure effective resource control and supervision. However, the schools face challenges including limited land availability, insufficient funding, human resource constraints, and inadequate government support, which impede their ability to provide well-rounded learning environments. The study points out the necessity for ongoing improvement efforts by principals to adapt educational facilities to evolving educational demands. It recommends prioritizing investments in facilities, staff training, and policy enhancements to address these challenges and foster comprehensive educational development. Future research should assess the effectiveness of these management practices in various contexts and their long-term impact on student outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Gbesoevi, E. S., Akinyemi, I. A., Oluwatunbi, E. A., and Odumade Ashogbon, A. S. (2024). School Facilities Maintenance Strategies and Quality Education Delivery in Public Junior Secondary Schools, Lagos State, Indonesian Journal of Economics, Social, and Humanities, Vol. 6, No. 1, 71–81. doi:10.31258/ijesh.6.1.71-81.
  2. Ghozali, M. (2022). Ergonomic of School Facilities and Infrastructure to Support Effective Schools, Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education (Vol. 1), 67–70.
  3. Munandar, D. R., Fathurrohman, N., and Ahmad, Y. B. (2023). Managerial Principles of Prophetic Schools on the Management of Educational Facilities and Infrastructure, Specialusis Ugdymas, Vol. 1, No. 44, 799–811.
  4. Dora, Y. M. (2017). Analysis Effect of Service Quality, Educational Facilities, and Method of Learning, Student Satisfaction and Loyalty to Students - Studies in the University of Widyatama Bandung, European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 16. doi:10.26417/ejser.v10i1.p16-27.
  5. Nela Noviarti, Hanif Al Kadri, Irsyad Irsyad, and Sulastri Sulastri. (2023). The Influence of Training and Infrastructure Facilities on the Performance of State Junior High School Teachers in the City of Padang, International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), Vol. 2, No. 5. doi:10.55227/ijhess.v2i5.420.
  6. Pramana, C., Chamidah, D., Suyatno, S., Renadi, F., and Syaharuddin, S. (2021). Strategies to Improved Education Quality in Indonesia: A Review., Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 3.
  7. Helda, H., and Syahrani, S. (2022). National Standards of Education in Contents Standards and Education Process Standards in Indonesia, Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), Vol. 2, No. 3, 257–269.
  8. Naibaho, F. R. (2023). The Most Fundamental Education Conflict In Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review, IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), Vol. 7, No. 1, 100–113.
  9. Sukasni, A., and Efendy, H. (2017). The Problematic of Education System in Indonesia and Reform Agenda, International Journal of Education, Vol. 9, No. 3, 183.
  10. Shintia, D., Asbari, M., Khairunisa, F., and Azizah, N. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia: Quo Vadis Kualitas Pendidikan Indonesia?, Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), Vol. 2, No. 6, 18–21.
  11. Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 59 Tahun 2021 tentang Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Minimal.
  12. Umayah, A., Paristiowati, M., Dianhar, H., and Hasibuan, N. A. P. (2023). Augmented Reality and Student Learning: Analysis of Mental Models of Salt Hydrolysis at SMAN 51 Jakarta, Indonesia, Journal of Educational Management and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1, 22–30. doi:10.60084/jeml.v1i1.53.
  13. Idroes, R., Subianto, M., Zahriah, Z., Afidh, R. P. F., Irvanizam, I., Noviandy, T. R., Sugara, D. R., Mursyida, W., Zhilalmuhana, T., and Idroes, G. M. (2023). Digital Transformations in Vocational High School: A Case Study of Management Information System Implementation in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Journal of Educational Management and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, 48–54. doi:10.60084/jeml.v1i2.128.
  14. Ahmad, M. (2021). Management of Facilities and Infrastructure in Schools, Akademika: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol. 10, No. 01, 93–112.
  15. Day, C., Sammons, P., and Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful School Leadership., Education Development Trust.
  16. Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 6, 679–689. doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0.
  17. Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., and Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 94–106. doi:10.1177/1534484320903890.
  18. Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., and Chauvin, S. (2020). A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 84, No. 1, 7120. doi:10.5688/ajpe7120.
  19. Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., and Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative Research: Design and Decision Making for New Researchers, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 19, 160940692096717. doi:10.1177/1609406920967174.
  20. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences, Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Vol. 9, No. 4, 50–79.
  21. Haq, Z. U., Rasheed, R., Rashid, A., and Akhter, S. (2023). Criteria for Assessing and Ensuring the Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research, International Journal of Business Reflections, Vol. 4, No. 2.
  22. Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s Parallel Criteria to Assess Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research on Indigenous Social Protection Systems, Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 4, 372–384.
  23. Siswanto, E., and Hidayati, D. (2020). Management Indicators of Good Infrastructure Facilities to Improve School Quality, International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 69–81.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-18

How to Cite

Istakri, D., Sofyan, H., & Ismail, I. (2024). Infrastructure Management for Improved Learning Outcomes: Insights from Junior High Schools in Southwest Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 2(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v2i1.169

Issue

Section

Articles