The Impact of Non-Green Trade Openness on Environmental Degradation in Newly Industrialized Countries

Authors

  • Sil van Hek Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, Netherlands
  • Muhlis Can Social Science Research Lab BETA Akademi, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Jan Brusselaers Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v2i2.148

Keywords:

Environmental degradation, International trade, Non-green trade openness index, Environmental Kuznets curve, Ecological footprint

Abstract

Environmental degradation due to human over-exploitation is one of the most pressing global issues. The ten Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) have recently witnessed substantial economic growth and involvement in global trade. In the discussion on environmental degradation, trade has a crucial role. Scholars use trade openness to test the scale effect on the environment. This research investigates the effect of non-green trade openness, economic growth, and energy consumption on ecological footprint. Panel estimation techniques such as cross-sectional dependence, slope homogeneity, unit root, and cointegration analyses are applied to panel data of ten NICs between 2003 and 2016. The Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) method reveals that non-green trade openness increases environmental degradation in the panel. Energy consumption and economic growth are also found to increase environmental degradation. Moreover, the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is validated. The research presents a few relevant policy implications. The NICs should invest in green energy and an energy-efficient economy and focus on stimulating green trade as a catalyst for sustainable economic development in order to improve the quality of their environment. This can be done by introducing higher tariffs on non-green products and investing in technological innovations for green production methods and renewable energy. Although local environmental pollution in the European Union (EU) decreases, an increase in pollution in the NICs threatens the global state of the environment. Therefore, non-green trade should be approached as an international problem that has detrimental effects on all countries in different phases of economic development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. He, Y., Wang, S., and Chen, N. (2024). Mineral Rents, Natural Resources Depletion, and Ecological Footprint Nexus in High Emitting Countries: Panel GLM Analysis, Resources Policy, Vol. 89, 104472. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104472.
  2. Maulidar, P., Fadila, S., Hafizah, I., Zikra, N., and Idroes, G. M. (2024). Enhancing Environmental Quality: Investigating the Impact of Hydropower Energy Consumption on CO2 Emissions in Indonesia, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 53–65. doi:10.60084/eje.v2i1.180.
  3. IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf.
  4. World Economic Forum. (2021). The Global Risks Report, from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021/.
  5. OWID. (2023). Our World in Data, from https://ourworldindata.org/#entries.
  6. IPCC. (2022). Climate Change: A Threat to Human Wellbeing and Health of the Planet. Taking Action Now Can Secure Our Future, from https://www.ipcc.ch/2022/02/28/pr-wgii-ar6/.
  7. World Bank. (2023). Climate Change Overview, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange/overview#3.
  8. UNCTAD. (2021). Carbon Emissions Anywhere Threaten Development Everywhere, from https://unctad.org/news/carbon-emissions-anywhere-threaten-development-everywhere.
  9. Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A., and Williams, L. (2006). The Distributional Impact of Climate Change on Rich and Poor Countries, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 159–178. doi:10.1017/S1355770X05002755.
  10. United Nations. (2023). The 17 Goals, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
  11. UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement, from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
  12. Zafar, M. W., Mirza, F. M., Zaidi, S. A. H., and Hou, F. (2019). The Nexus of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and CO2 Emissions in the Framework of EKC: Evidence from Emerging Economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 26, No. 15, 15162–15173. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04912-w.
  13. Sawe, B. E. (2017). What Is a Newly Industrialised Country?, from https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-a-newly-industrialized-country.html.
  14. Zhang, S., Liu, X., and Bae, J. (2017). Does Trade Openness Affect CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Ten Newly Industrialized Countries?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 24, No. 21, 17616–17625. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8.
  15. Boddin, D. (2016). The Role of Newly Industrialized Economies in Global Value Chains, International Monetary Fund.
  16. Karaduman, C. (2022). The Effects of Economic Globalization and Productivity on Environmental Quality: Evidence from Newly Industrialized Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, 639–652. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15717-1.
  17. GFN. (2023). Open Data Platform, from https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/.
  18. Wang, Q., and Zhang, F. (2021). Free Trade and Renewable Energy: A Cross-Income Levels Empirical Investigation Using Two Trade Openness Measures, Renewable Energy, Vol. 168, 1027–1039. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.065.
  19. Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 2, 353–377. doi:10.2307/2118443.
  20. Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Examining the Linkages, Ecological Economics, Vol. 48, No. 1, 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007.
  21. Benzerrouk, Z., Abid, M., and Sekrafi, H. (2021). Pollution Haven or Halo Effect? A Comparative Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries, Energy Reports, Vol. 7, 4862–4871. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.076.
  22. Can, M., Oluc, I., Sturm, B., Guzel, I., Gavurova, B., and Popp, J. (2022). Nexus between Trading Non-green Products and Environment: Introducing Non-green Trade Openness Index, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.950453.
  23. OECD. (2011). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011: Innovation and Growth in Knowledge Economies, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/sti_scoreboard-2011-en.pdf?expires=1713865011&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=90075C71229AD9A11EE7232CCC6BC271.
  24. Mitić, P., Kresoja, M., and Minović, J. (2019). A Literature Survey of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Economic Analysis, Vol. 52, No. 1, 109–127. doi:10.28934/ea.19.52.12.pp109-127.
  25. Can, M., Ahmed, Z., Mercan, M., and Kalugina, O. A. (2021). The Role of Trading Environment-Friendly Goods in Environmental Sustainability: Does Green Openness Matter for OECD Countries?, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 295, 113038. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113038.
  26. Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., and Huang, R. (2021). The Role of Financial Deepening and Green Technology on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Major OECD Economies, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 41, 101794. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794.
  27. Can, M., Ben Jebli, M., and Brusselaers, J. (2022). Can Green Trade Save the Environment? Introducing the Green (Trade) Openness Index, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 29, 44091–44102. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18920-w.
  28. Hu, G., Can, M., Paramati, S. R., Doğan, B., and Fang, J. (2020). The Effect of Import Product Diversification on Carbon Emissions: New Evidence for Sustainable Economic Policies, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 65, 198–210. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.004.
  29. Lin, Y., Huang, R., and Yao, X. (2021). Air Pollution and Environmental Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study Based on Heavy Polluting Industries, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 278, 124313. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124313.
  30. Shen, B., Cao, Y., and Xu, X. (2020). Product Line Design and Quality Differentiation for Green and Non-green Products in a Supply Chain, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, 148–164. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1656843.
  31. Grossman, G., and Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w3914.
  32. Oluc, I., Can, M., Eronal, Y., and Saboori, B. (2024). Assessing the Environmental Implications of Structural Change in Middle-Income Countries: Introducing the Structural Change Index, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 8, 6339–6356. doi:10.1007/s13762-023-05408-4.
  33. Boleti, E., Garas, A., Kyriakou, A., and Lapatinas, A. (2021). Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from a World Sample, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Vol. 26, No. 3, 251–270. doi:10.1007/s10666-021-09750-0.
  34. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., and Huang, B. (2021). An Environmental Impact Assessment of Economic Complexity and Energy Consumption: Does Institutional Quality Make a Difference?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 89, 106603. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603.
  35. Doğan, B., Saboori, B., and Can, M. (2019). Does Economic Complexity Matter for Environmental Degradation? An Empirical Analysis for Different Stages of Development, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 26, No. 31, 31900–31912. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1.
  36. Aluko, O. A., Opoku, E. E. O., and Acheampong, A. O. (2023). Economic Complexity and Environmental Degradation: Evidence from OECD Countries, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2767–2788. doi:10.1002/bse.3269.
  37. Nguyen, C. P., and Doytch, N. (2022). Does Knowledge Matter for the Environment? Global Evidence of Economic Complexity and Ecological Footprints, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 54, 82122–82139. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21547-6.
  38. Cole, M. A., and Elliott, R. J. R. (2003). Determining the Trade–Environment Composition Effect: The Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 46, No. 3, 363–383. doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4.
  39. Liu, H., Kim, H., and Choe, J. (2019). Export Diversification, CO2 Emissions and EKC: Panel Data Analysis of 125 Countries, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 361–393. doi:10.1007/s41685-018-0099-8.
  40. Shahzad, U., Ferraz, D., Doğan, B., and Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. (2020). Export Product Diversification and CO2 Emissions: Contextual Evidences from Developing and Developed Economies, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 276, 124146. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124146.
  41. Apergis, N., Can, M., Gozgor, G., and Lau, C. K. M. (2018). Effects of Export Concentration on CO2 Emissions in Developed Countries: An Empirical Analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 25, No. 14, 14106–14116. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1634-x.
  42. Sharma, R., Sinha, A., and Kautish, P. (2021). Examining the Nexus between Export Diversification and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from BRICS Nations, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 43, 61732–61747. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14889-0.
  43. Can, M., Dogan, B., and Saboori, B. (2020). Does Trade Matter for Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries? New Evidence in the Context of Export Product Diversification, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 13, 14702–14710. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08000-2.
  44. Jiang, S., Mentel, G., Shahzadi, I., Ben Jebli, M., and Iqbal, N. (2022). Renewable Energy, Trade Diversification and Environmental Footprints: Evidence for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Renewable Energy, Vol. 187, 874–886. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.134.
  45. Sharma, R., Shahbaz, M., Kautish, P., and Vo, X. V. (2023). Diversified Imports As Catalysts for Ecological Footprint: Examining the BRICS Experience, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 25, No. 4, 3153–3181. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02177-x.
  46. Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., and Lean, H. H. (2015). The Influence of Economic Growth, Urbanization, Trade Openness, Financial Development, and Renewable Energy on Pollution in Europe, Natural Hazards, Vol. 79, No. 1, 621–644. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1865-9.
  47. Destek, M. A., Balli, E., and Manga, M. (2016). The Relationship between CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption, Urbanization and Trade Openness for Selected CEECs, Research in World Economy, Vol. 7, No. 1. doi:10.5430/rwe.v7n1p52.
  48. Dogan, E., and Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 Emissions in the European Union: The Role of Renewable and Non-renewable Energy, Renewable Energy, Vol. 94, 429–439. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078.
  49. Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., and Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for the EU Countries: The Role of Ecological Footprint, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 25, No. 29, 29387–29396. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4.
  50. Tachie, A. K., Xingle, L., Dauda, L., Mensah, C. N., Appiah-Twum, F., and Adjei Mensah, I. (2020). The Influence of Trade Openness on Environmental Pollution in EU-18 Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 28, 35535–35555. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09718-9.
  51. Pata, U. K., Dam, M. M., and Kaya, F. (2022). How Effective Are Renewable Energy, Tourism, Trade Openness, and Foreign Direct Investment on CO2 Emissions? An EKC Analysis for ASEAN Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 6, 14821–14837. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-23160-z.
  52. Mongo, M., Belaïd, F., and Ramdani, B. (2021). The Effects of Environmental Innovations on CO2 Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Europe, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 118, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004.
  53. Kasman, A., and Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade and Urbanization in New EU Member and Candidate Countries: A Panel Data Analysis, Economic Modelling, Vol. 44, 97–103. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022.
  54. Sharif Hossain, M. (2011). Panel Estimation for CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness and Urbanization of Newly Industrialized Countries, Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 11, 6991–6999. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.042.
  55. Bernard, J., and Mandal, S. K. (2016). The Impact of Trade Openness on Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of Emerging and Developing Economies, 195–208. doi:10.2495/EID160181.
  56. Lu, W.-C. (2020). The Interplay among Ecological Footprint, Real Income, Energy Consumption, and Trade Openness in 13 Asian Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 36, 45148–45160. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10399-7.
  57. Van Tran, N. (2020). The Environmental Effects of Trade Openness in Developing Countries: Conflict or Cooperation?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 16, 19783–19797. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9.
  58. Zameer, H., Yasmeen, H., Zafar, M. W., Waheed, A., and Sinha, A. (2020). Analyzing the Association between Innovation, Economic Growth, and Environment: Divulging the Importance of FDI and Trade Openness in India, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 23, 29539–29553. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09112-5.
  59. Khan, H., Weili, L., Khan, I., and Khamphengxay, S. (2021). Renewable Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Environmental Degradation: A Panel Data Analysis of Developing and Developed Countries, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2021, 1–13. doi:10.1155/2021/6691046.
  60. Udeagha, M. C., and Ngepah, N. (2022). Does Trade Openness Mitigate the Environmental Degradation in South Africa?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 13, 19352–19377. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z.
  61. Lee, C., Olasehinde‐Williams, G., and Gyamfi, B. A. (2023). The Synergistic Effect of Green Trade and Economic Complexity on Sustainable Environment: A New Perspective on the Economic and Ecological Components of Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development, Vol. 31, No. 2, 976–989. doi:10.1002/sd.2433.
  62. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Bai, Y., Qiao, G., Popp, J., and Oláh, J. (2022). Financial Inclusion, Technological Innovations, and Environmental Quality: Analyzing the Role of Green Openness, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263.
  63. Li, J., Dong, K., Dong, X., and Shahbaz, M. (2022). How Green Trade Influences Pollution Emissions in China: A Provincial Perspective, Energy Economics, Vol. 115, 106330. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106330.
  64. Idroes, G. M., Hardi, I., Hilal, I. S., Utami, R. T., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2024). Economic Growth and Environmental Impact: Assessing the Role of Geothermal Energy in Developing and Developed Countries, Innovation and Green Development, Vol. 3, No. 3, 100144. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2024.100144.
  65. World Development Indicators. (2021). World Development Indicators, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development- indicators.
  66. BETA Akademi. (2023). Non-Green Trade Openness Index, from https://www.betaakademi.com/non-green-openness-index.
  67. Rees, W. (2018). Ecological Footprint, Companion to Environmental Studies, 43–48. doi:10.4324/9781315640051-10.
  68. Idroes, G. M., Hardi, I., Rahman, M. H., Afjal, M., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2024). The Dynamic Impact of Non-renewable and Renewable Energy on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Ecological Footprint in Indonesia, Carbon Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 35. doi:10.1007/s44246-024-00117-0.
  69. Maulidar, P., Fitriyani, F., Sasmita, N. R., Hardi, I., and Idroes, G. M. (2024). Exploring Indonesia’s CO2 Emissions: The Impact of Agriculture, Economic Growth, Capital and Labor, Grimsa Journal of Business and Economics Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 43–55. doi:10.61975/gjbes.v1i1.22.
  70. Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, World Development, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1419–1439. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004.
  71. van Ledden, A., Can, M., and Brusselaers, J. (2024). Toward a Greener Future: Investigating the Environmental Quality of Non-Green Trading in OECD Countries, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 15–28. doi:10.60084/eje.v2i1.149.
  72. Hardi, I., Ray, S., Attari, M. U. Q., Ali, N., and Idroes, G. M. (2024). Innovation and Economic Growth in the Top Five Southeast Asian Economies: A Decomposition Analysis, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1–14. doi:10.60084/eje.v2i1.145.
  73. Breusch, T. S., and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, No. 1, 239. doi:10.2307/2297111.
  74. Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panels, Empirical Economics, Vol. 60, No. 1, 13–50. doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7.
  75. Pesaran, M. H., and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 142, No. 1, 50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
  76. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
  77. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel Cointegration Tests of the Fisher Effect, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 193–233. doi:10.1002/jae.967.
  78. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, No. s1, 653–670. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653.
  79. Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels, 93–130. doi:10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2.
  80. Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Panel Cointegration Analysis from Canadian Industrial Sector Perspective, Energy Economics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 358–364. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005.
  81. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 94, No. 446, 621–634. doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156.
  82. Destek, M. A., and Okumus, I. (2019). Does Pollution Haven Hypothesis Hold in Newly Industrialized Countries? Evidence from Ecological Footprint, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 26, No. 23, 23689–23695. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05614-z.
  83. Kongbuamai, N., Bui, Q., and Nimsai, S. (2021). The Effects of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption on the Ecological Footprint: The Role of Environmental Policy in BRICS Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 22, 27885–27899. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12551-3.
  84. Sinha, A., and Sengupta, T. (2019). Impact of Natural Resource Rents on Human Development: What Is the Role of Globalization in Asia Pacific Countries?, Resources Policy, Vol. 63, 101413. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101413.
  85. Alvi, S., Ahmad, I., and Rehman, A. (2023). Trade of Environmental versus Non-Environmental Goods and Carbon Emissions in High and Middle–Income Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 24, 65283–65295. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26972-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-14

How to Cite

van Hek, S. ., Can, M. and Brusselaers, J. (2024) “The Impact of Non-Green Trade Openness on Environmental Degradation in Newly Industrialized Countries”, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, 2(2), pp. 66–81. doi: 10.60084/eje.v2i2.148.