N-Shaped or Inverted N-Shaped EKC? The Role of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy in Environmental Sustainability

Authors

  • Ghalieb Mutig Idroes Research Fellow at Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul 55183, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Hossein Ali Fakher Department of Business Management, Ayandegan University, Tonekabon, Iran
  • Iin Shabrina Hilal Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Dimas Bagus Wiranatakusuma Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul 55183, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v4i1.400

Keywords:

Environmental Kuznets curve, CO2 emissions, Ecological footprint, Sustainability, Renewable energy consumption, Indonesia

Abstract

Climate change and global warming have become urgent challenges for all nations. Rapid population growth continues to raise energy demand, generating outputs that often create negative externalities and worsen environmental conditions. The Ecological footprint (EFP) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are key indicators of environmental quality, with higher levels of these indicators generally reflecting a deterioration in environmental conditions. This study examines the effects of economic growth, renewable energy, and non-renewable energy on Indonesia’s environmental quality from 1965 to 2023 using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, Granger causality and wavelet coherence analysis. The results reveal Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) dynamics, with an N-shaped EKC for the ecological footprint and an inverted N-shaped EKC for CO2 emissions. Capital formation reduces both EFP and CO2 emissions, while renewable energy significantly decreases CO2 emissions. Granger causality analysis shows directional relationships between economic growth, energy use, and environmental quality. Wavelet coherence results indicate strong co-movement between economic growth and non-renewable energy with EFP and CO2, confirming that fossil-fuel-driven expansion remains the main driver of degradation. In contrast, renewable energy and capital formation show negative coherence with environmental indicators, reflecting their growing role in mitigating ecological stress. Overall, the findings highlight Indonesia’s dual challenge of sustaining economic growth while curbing long-term environmental degradation, emphasizing the need for structural reforms, greater investment in renewable energy, and stronger environmental governance to ensure a sustainable development path.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Grossman, G., and Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w3914.
  2. Elfaki, K. E., and Heriqbaldi, U. (2023). Analyzing the Moderating Role of Industrialization on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) in Indonesia: What Are the Contributions of Financial Development, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth?, Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 5, 4270. doi:10.3390/su15054270.
  3. Udemba, E. N., and Philip, L. D. (2022). Policy Insight from Renewable Energy, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and Urbanization towards Climate Goal: Insight from Indonesia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 36, 54492–54506. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19599-9.
  4. Wang, W., Wei, K., Kubatko, O., Piven, V., Chortok, Y., and Derykolenko, O. (2023). Economic Growth and Sustainable Transition: Investigating Classical and Novel Factors in Developed Countries, Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 16, 12346. doi:10.3390/su151612346.
  5. Mohamed, E. F., Abdullah, A., Jaaffar, A. H., and Osabohien, R. (2024). Reinvestigating the EKC Hypothesis: Does Renewable Energy in Power Generation Reduce Carbon Emissions and Ecological Footprint?, Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 53, 101387. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101387.
  6. Hasan, M. B., Wieloch, J., Ali, M. S., Zikovic, S., and Uddin, G. S. (2023). A New Answer to the Old Question of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Does It Work for BRICS Countries?, Resources Policy, Vol. 87, 104332. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104332.
  7. Tahir, M., Burki, U., Alsabhan, T. H., Jaboob, M., Najam, U., and Marimuthu, M. (2025). Environmental Phillips and Kuznets Curves in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development States: Fresh Insights, Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, Vol. 23, No. 3, 301–309. doi:10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.07.002.
  8. Ullah, A., Dogan, M., Pervaiz, A., Ather Bukhari, A. A., Akkus, H. T., and Dogan, H. (2024). The Impact of Digitalization, Technological and Financial Innovation on Environmental Quality in OECD Countries: Investigation of N-Shaped EKC Hypothesis, Technology in Society, Vol. 77, 102484. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102484.
  9. Bekun, F. V., Gyamfi, B. A., Olasehinde-Williams, G., and Yadav, A. (2024). Revisiting the Foreign Direct Investment-CO2 Emissions Nexus within the N-EKC Framework: Evidence from South Asian Countries, Sustainable Futures, Vol. 8, 100357. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100357.
  10. Makhdum, M. S. A., Usman, M., Kousar, R., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Radulescu, M., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). How Do Institutional Quality, Natural Resources, Renewable Energy, and Financial Development Reduce Ecological Footprint without Hindering Economic Growth Trajectory? Evidence from China, Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 21, 13910. doi:10.3390/su142113910.
  11. Kabir, M., Habiba, U. E., Khan, W., Shah, A., Rahim, S., Rios-Escalante, P. R. D. los, Farooqi, Z.-U.-R., Ali, L., and Shafiq, M. (2023). Climate Change Due to Increasing Concentration of Carbon Dioxide and Its Impacts on Environment in 21st Century; a Mini Review, Journal of King Saud University - Science, Vol. 35, No. 5, 102693. doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102693.
  12. Maxwell, S. L., Butt, N., Maron, M., McAlpine, C. A., Chapman, S., Ullmann, A., Segan, D. B., and Watson, J. E. M. (2019). Conservation Implications of Ecological Responses to Extreme Weather and Climate Events, Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 25, No. 4, 613–625. doi:10.1111/ddi.12878.
  13. Idroes, G. M., Hilal, I. S., Hafizah, I., Hamaguchi, Y., Bruyn, C. de, Agustina, M., Pernici, A., and Stancu, S. (2025). Do Natural Disasters, Fossil Fuels, and Renewable Energy Affect CO2 Emissions and the Ecological Footprint?, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 47–63. doi:10.60084/eje.v3i1.285.
  14. Gomez-Echeverri, L. (2018). Climate and Development: Enhancing Impact through Stronger Linkages in the Implementation of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 376, No. 2119, 20160444. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0444.
  15. Jiang, Y., Tian, S., Xu, Z., Gao, L., Xiao, L., Chen, S., Xu, K., Chang, J., Luo, Z., and Shi, Z. (2022). Decoupling Environmental Impact from Economic Growth to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in China, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 312, 114978. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114978.
  16. Hickel, J. (2019). The Contradiction of the Sustainable Development Goals: Growth versus Ecology on a Finite Planet, Sustainable Development, Vol. 27, No. 5, 873–884. doi:10.1002/sd.1947.
  17. Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., Orlovic Lovren, V., and Willats, J. (2019). Using the Sustainable Development Goals towards a Better Understanding of Sustainability Challenges, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 179–190. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674.
  18. Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., and Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1222. doi:10.3390/su14031222.
  19. van Hek, S., Can, M., and Brusselaers, J. (2024). The Impact of Non-Green Trade Openness on Environmental Degradation in Newly Industrialized Countries, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 66–81. doi:10.60084/eje.v2i2.148.
  20. Massagony, A., and Budiono. (2023). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis Valid on CO2 Emissions in Indonesia?, International Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 80, No. 1, 20–31. doi:10.1080/00207233.2022.2029097.
  21. Dogan, E., Taspinar, N., and Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2019). Determinants of Ecological Footprint in MINT Countries, Energy & Environment, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1065–1086. doi:10.1177/0958305X19834279.
  22. Nagarajan, C. D., Afjal, M., and Idroes, G. M. (2025). Distinct Impacts of Frugality on the Intention to Embrace Energy-Efficient and Energy-Generating Products, International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, 710–730. doi:10.1108/IJESM-06-2024-0001.
  23. Al Numan, A., Tahrim, F., Esquivias, M. A., Biswas, M. K., and Primanthi, M. R. (2025). Testing the Pollution Haven and Inverted N-Shaped EKC Hypotheses in the ASEAN Region: The Impact of FDI and Energy Mix on Environmental Quality, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, Vol. 26, 100698. doi:10.1016/j.indic.2025.100698.
  24. Chen, S., Wang, Z., Du, D., and Kong, Q. (2025). How Does Green-Infrastructure Investment Empower Urban Sustainable Development?—Mechanisms and Empirical Tests, Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 13, 5751. doi:10.3390/su17135751.
  25. Fu, Q., Álvarez-Otero, S., Sial, M. S., Comite, U., Zheng, P., Samad, S., and Oláh, J. (2021). Impact of Renewable Energy on Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions—Evidence from BRICS Countries, Processes, Vol. 9, No. 8, 1281. doi:10.3390/pr9081281.
  26. Idroes, G. M., Hardi, I., Hilal, I. S., Utami, R. T., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2024). Economic Growth and Environmental Impact: Assessing the Role of Geothermal Energy in Developing and Developed Countries, Innovation and Green Development, Vol. 3, No. 3, 100144. doi:10.1016/j.igd.2024.100144.
  27. Kurniawan, R., and Managi, S. (2018). Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: An Assessment, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 54, No. 3, 339–361. doi:10.1080/00074918.2018.1450962.
  28. Thawley, C., Crystallin, M., and Verico, K. (2024). Towards a Higher Growth Path for Indonesia, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 60, No. 3, 247–282. doi:10.1080/00074918.2024.2432035.
  29. Fakher, H. A., and Idroes, G. M. (2025). Room for Improving the Ecological Sustainability Gap in G20 Economies through the Lens of Load Capacity Factor: The Role of Green Energy Initiatives as Moderators, Innovations in Environmental Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1–18. doi:10.48313/iee.v1i1.33.
  30. Idroes, G. M., Hardi, I., Rahman, M. H., Afjal, M., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2024). The Dynamic Impact of Non-Renewable and Renewable Energy on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Ecological Footprint in Indonesia, Carbon Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 35. doi:10.1007/s44246-024-00117-0.
  31. Idroes, G. M., Syahnur, S., Majid, S. A., Sasmita, N. R., and Idroes, R. (2021). Provincial Economic Level Analysis in Indonesia Based on the Geothermal Energy Potential and Growth Regional Domestic Products Using Cluster Analysis, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 1087, No. 1, 012079. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1087/1/012079.
  32. Malahayati, M. (2023). Indonesia’s Forest Management Progress: Empirical Analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curve, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, 216–249. doi:10.51599/are.2023.09.03.10.
  33. Hardi, I., Ringga, E. S., Idroes, G. M., Astina, C., Muda, U. P., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2025). Green Human Development in Indonesia: Role of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy, Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, Vol. 23, No. 3, 397–411. doi:10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.07.010.
  34. Global Footprint Network. (2024). Ecological Footprint Per Person, from https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.137195632.1318476370.1760173690-896710240.1758280365#/.
  35. Climate Change Performance Index. (2025). Indonesia, from https://ccpi.org/country/idn/.
  36. Jena, P. K., Mujtaba, A., Joshi, D. P. P., Satrovic, E., and Adeleye, B. N. (2022). Exploring the Nature of EKC Hypothesis in Asia’s Top Emitters: Role of Human Capital, Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 59, 88557–88576. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21551-w.
  37. Pata, U., Shahzad, F., Fareed, Z., and Rehman, M. (2022). Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis With Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint Pressure Index for India: A RALS-Fourier Cointegration Test, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.886515.
  38. Caglar, A. E., Mert, M., and Boluk, G. (2021). Testing the Role of Information and Communication Technologies and Renewable Energy Consumption in Ecological Footprint Quality: Evidence from World Top 10 Pollutant Footprint Countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 298, 126784. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126784.
  39. Pata, U. K., and Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC Hypothesis with Renewable Energy Consumption, Human Capital, Globalization and Trade Openness for China: Evidence from Augmented ARDL Approach with a Structural Break, Energy, Vol. 216, 119220. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220.
  40. Georgescu, I., and Kinnunen, J. (2024). Effects of FDI, GDP and Energy Use on Ecological Footprint in Finland: An ARDL Approach, World Development Sustainability, Vol. 4, 100157. doi:10.1016/j.wds.2024.100157.
  41. Danish, Zhang, B., Wang, B., and Wang, Z. (2017). Role of Renewable Energy and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 156, 855–864. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203.
  42. Al-mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., and Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis by Utilizing the Ecological Footprint as an Indicator of Environmental Degradation, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 48, 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029.
  43. Sinha, A., and Shahbaz, M. (2018). Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: Role of Renewable Energy Generation in India, Renewable Energy, Vol. 119, 703–711. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058.
  44. Dong, K., Sun, R., Jiang, H., and Zeng, X. (2018). CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: What Roles Can Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Play?, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 196, 51–63. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.271.
  45. Sarkodie, S. A., Adams, S., Owusu, P. A., Leirvik, T., and Ozturk, I. (2020). Mitigating Degradation and Emissions in China: The Role of Environmental Sustainability, Human Capital and Renewable Energy, Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 719, 137530. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137530.
  46. Hakkak, M., Altintaş, N., and Hakkak, S. (2023). Exploring the Relationship between Nuclear and Renewable Energy Usage, Ecological Footprint, and Load Capacity Factor: A Study of the Russian Federation Testing the EKC and LCC Hypothesis, Renewable Energy Focus, Vol. 46, 356–366. doi:10.1016/j.ref.2023.07.005.
  47. Acaroğlu, H., Kartal, H. M., and García Márquez, F. P. (2023). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Terms of Ecological Footprint and CO2 Emissions through Energy Diversification for Turkey, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 22, 63289–63304. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26278-w.
  48. Wang, Q., Wang, X., Li, R., and Jiang, X. (2024). Reinvestigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) of Carbon Emissions and Ecological Footprint in 147 Countries: A Matter of Trade Protectionism, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 11, No. 1, 160. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02639-9.
  49. Schneiter, P., and Mellon-Bedi, S. (2025). The Environmental Kuznets Curve Revisited: A Spatial Panel Model with Heterogeneous Coefficients, Energy Economics, Vol. 143, 108237. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108237.
  50. Miyan, M. S., Cheong, C. W. H., Sharif, A., and Afshan, S. (2025). Green Finance, Innovation, and Environment: Testing the EKC in ASEAN-4 with MMQR Approach, Global Transitions. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2025.09.001.
  51. Saboori, B., and Sulaiman, J. (2013). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Countries: A Cointegration Approach, Energy, Vol. 55, 813–822. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.038.
  52. Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Testing the EKC Hypothesis in Indonesia: Empirical Evidence from the ARDL-Based Bounds and Wavelet Coherence Approaches, Applied Economics Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 78–100. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.334394.
  53. Sugiawan, Y., and Managi, S. (2016). The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Indonesia: Exploring the Potential of Renewable Energy, Energy Policy, Vol. 98, 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.029.
  54. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J. Bin, and Mohd, S. (2012). An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions in Indonesia: The Role of Energy Consumption and Foreign Trade, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 4, No. 2. doi:10.5539/ijef.v4n2p243.
  55. Satrio, A. M. A., Fattah, S., and Fitrianti, R. (2025). Balancing Growth and Ecology: Evidence from Indonesia’s Economic Development and Environmental Impact, 3200–3212. doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-758-8_267.
  56. Raghutla, C., Padmagirisan, P., Sakthivel, P., Chittedi, K. R., and Mishra, S. (2022). The Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Ecological Footprint in N-11 Countries: Evidence from Panel Quantile Regression Approach, Renewable Energy, Vol. 197, 125–137. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.100.
  57. Khalid, M. W., Shah, A. H., Khan, A. U., and Nicita, L. (2025). Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis in High-Income EU Countries: The Role of Technological Innovation, Green Energy, and Transport Energy in Shaping Ecological Footprints, Sustainable Futures, Vol. 10, 101174. doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101174.
  58. Simbi, C. H., Yao, F., and Zhang, J. (2025). Sustainable Development in Africa: A Comprehensive Analysis of GDP, CO2 Emissions, and Socio-Economic Factors, Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 2, 679. doi:10.3390/su17020679.
  59. Alam, M. M., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., and Ozturk, I. (2016). Relationships among Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Population Growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 70, 466–479. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043.
  60. Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G. S., and Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Evaluation Using a Panel Quantile Regression Approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 25, No. 6, 5848–5861. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0.
  61. Özokcu, S., and Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic Growth, Energy, and Environmental Kuznets Curve, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 72, 639–647. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059.
  62. Deng, D., Dong, J., Zhang, Y., Liang, W., Liu, K., and Li, L. (2023). Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Forest Fragmentation: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 151, 102970. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102970.
  63. Hossain, M. R., Rej, S., Awan, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Islam, M. S., Das, N., and Hossain, M. E. (2023). Natural Resource Dependency and Environmental Sustainability under N-Shaped EKC: The Curious Case of India, Resources Policy, Vol. 80, 103150. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103150.
  64. Du, J., Ahmad, M., Uddin, I., Xu, H., and Gu, X. (2023). From Growth to Sustainability: Investigating N-Shaped EKC and the Role of Energy Productivity, Technological Advancement, and Human Capital in OECD Economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 46, 102374–102388. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29514-5.
  65. Zeraibi, A., Radulescu, M., Khan, M. K., Hafeez, M., and Jahanger, A. (2024). Analyzing the Linkage between Public Debt, Renewable Electricity Output, and CO2 Emissions in Emerging Economies: Does the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Exist?, Energy & Environment, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2407–2430. doi:10.1177/0958305X231151678.
  66. Shehzad, K., Zeraibi, A., and Zaman, U. (2022). Testing the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve in Algeria: An Imperious Role of Natural Resources and Economic Globalization, Resources Policy, Vol. 77, 102700. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102700.
  67. Gao, J., Hassan, M. S., Kalim, R., Sharif, A., Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., and Mahmood, H. (2023). The Role of Clean and Unclean Energy Resources in Inspecting N-Shaped Impact of Industrial Production on Environmental Quality: A Case of High Polluting Economies, Resources Policy, Vol. 80, 103217. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103217.
  68. Sharma, R., Sinha, A., and Kautish, P. (2021). Does Renewable Energy Consumption Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Eight Developing Countries of Asia, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 285, 124867. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867.
  69. Abbasi, K. R., Awan, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Rej, S., and Banday, T. P. (2023). Investigating the Inverted N-Shape EKC in the Presence of Renewable and Nuclear Energy in a Global Sample, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1179–1194. doi:10.1007/s10098-022-02436-5.
  70. Bulut, A., and Tekdemir, N. (2025). The Inverted N-Shaped Relationship between Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from OECD Countries, Economic Annals, Vol. 70, No. 244, 7–33. doi:10.2298/EKA2544007B.
  71. Sun, W., Li, Q., and Uddin, I. (2025). Financial Inclusion, Environmental Technology, and Sustainable Environment in China: Evidence from an N-Shaped EKC, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 13. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2025.1578559.
  72. Aljadani, A., Toumi, H., Toumi, S., Hsini, M., and Jallali, B. (2021). Investigation of the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve for COVID-19 Mitigation in the KSA, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 23, 29681–29700. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12713-3.
  73. Zhao, L., Zhong, W., and Jin, Y. (2025). Using Regression Model to Fit EKC Curve to Analyze the Sustainable Development of Environment and Economy, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1–15. doi:10.4018/IJKM.366584.
  74. Qayoom, A., and Altaf, N. (2025). Testing the EKC Hypothesis in India: Moderating Role of Trade Openness, EconomiA. doi:10.1108/ECON-09-2024-0137.
  75. Bandyopadhyay, A., and Rej, S. (2021). Can Nuclear Energy Fuel an Environmentally Sustainable Economic Growth? Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis for India, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 44, 63065–63086. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15220-7.
  76. Tsujimoto, M. (2023). Public Utilities’ Corporate Growth and Environmental Conservation: Evidence from Japan, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 404–422. doi:10.32479/ijeep.14405.
  77. Bekhet, H. A., and Othman, N. S. (2018). The Role of Renewable Energy to Validate Dynamic Interaction between CO2 Emissions and GDP toward Sustainable Development in Malaysia, Energy Economics, Vol. 72, 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.028.
  78. Minlah, M. K., Zhang, X., Ganyoh, P. N., and Bibi, A. (2021). Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation Exist for Ghana? Evidence from the Bootstrap Rolling Window Granger Causality Test Approach, Forestry Economics Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 38–52. doi:10.1108/FER-03-2021-0008.
  79. Tsiantikoudis, S., Zafeiriou, E., Kyriakopoulos, G., and Arabatzis, G. (2019). Revising the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: An Empirical Study for Bulgaria, Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 16, 4364. doi:10.3390/su11164364.
  80. Fang, D., Hao, P., Wang, Z., and Hao, J. (2019). Analysis of the Influence Mechanism of CO2 Emissions and Verification of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 6, 944. doi:10.3390/ijerph16060944.
  81. Zhu, Z., Jia, Q., Xie, S., Song, K., Zhang, T., Cai, R., and Wang, H. (2024). Estimating the Impacts of Economic Globalization and Natural Resources on Ecological Footprints within the N-Shaped EKC in the Next 11 Economies, Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, 27465. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78461-9.
  82. Sancar, C., Akbaş, Y. E., Suluk, S., Atay Polat, M., and Aslan, A. (2025). The Impact of Financial Stability, Globalization, and Economic Stability on Ecological Footprint From the Perspective of EKC Hypothesis: New Evidence From a Fourier Panel Data Analysis for BRICS‐T Countries, Sustainable Development. doi:10.1002/sd.70297.
  83. Ibrahim, M. D., and Abbas, M. H. I. (2022). Existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve and Its Relevance to SDGs Policy: A Study in Java Region, Indonesia, Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, 162. doi:10.31328/jsed.v5i2.3657.
  84. Zurrah, Z., Suriani, S., Abrar, M., and Saputra, J. (2025). Investigating the Impact of Long and Short-Term Natural Resource Rents on Ecological Footprints: Evidence from Indonesia, Planning Malaysia, Vol. 23. doi:10.21837/pm.v23i36.1705.
  85. Burki, U., and Tahir, M. (2022). Determinants of Environmental Degradation: Evidenced-Based Insights from ASEAN Economies, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 306, 114506. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114506.
  86. Farooq, U., Bhanja, N., Rather, S. R., and Dar, A. B. (2024). From Pollution to Prosperity: Using Inverted N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve to Predict India’s Environmental Improvement Milestones, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 434, 140175. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140175.
  87. Jahanger, A., Hossain, M. R., Onwe, J. C., Ogwu, S. O., Awan, A., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). Analyzing the N-Shaped EKC among Top Nuclear Energy Generating Nations: A Novel Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Approach, Gondwana Research, Vol. 116, 73–88. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2022.12.012.
  88. Narcisse, M., Zhang, S., Shahid, M. S., and Shehzad, K. (2023). Investigating the N-Shaped EKC in China: An Imperious Role of Energy Use and Health Expenditures, Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 11. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1149507.
  89. Awan, A. M., and Azam, M. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of GDP per Capita on Environmental Degradation for G-20 Economies: Does N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Exist?, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 24, No. 9, 11103–11126. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01899-8.
  90. Koc, S., and Bulus, G. C. (2020). Testing Validity of the EKC Hypothesis in South Korea: Role of Renewable Energy and Trade Openness, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, No. 23, 29043–29054. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09172-7.
  91. Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., and Balsalobre, D. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between Energy Usage Segregation and Environmental Degradation in N-11 Countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 168, 1217–1229. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071.
  92. Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z., Acheampong, A. O., and Nathaniel, S. P. (2023). Renewable Energy, Nonrenewable Energy, and Environmental Quality Nexus: An Investigation of the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Based on Six Environmental Indicators, Energy, Vol. 263, 125660. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125660.
  93. Huang, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Kong, W., Yan, J., and Xia, F. (2023). Trapped in Dilemma: Inverted N-Shaped EKC Evidence of Economic Growth and Ecological Land in a Spatial Spillover Perspective, Applied Geography, Vol. 161, 103145. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103145.
  94. Wang, Q., Yang, T., and Li, R. (2023). Does Income Inequality Reshape the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis? A Nonlinear Panel Data Analysis, Environmental Research, Vol. 216, 114575. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.114575.
  95. Zeraibi, A., Ahmed, Z., Shehzad, K., Murshed, M., Nathaniel, S. P., and Mahmood, H. (2022). Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis by Assessing the Complementarities between Fiscal, Monetary, and Environmental Development Policies in China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 16, 23545–23560. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17288-7.
  96. Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., Gyamfi, B. A., and Ampomah, A. B. (2021). The Environmental Aspects of Conventional and Clean Energy Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is N-Shaped Hypothesis Valid?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 47, 66695–66708. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14758-w.
  97. Yang, G., Sun, T., Wang, J., and Li, X. (2015). Modeling the Nexus between Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth, Energy Policy, Vol. 86, 104–117. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.031.
  98. Shaheen, F., Zaman, K., Lodhi, M. S., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., and Abro, M. M. Q. (2022). Do Affluent Nations Value a Clean Environment and Preserve It? Evaluating the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 31, 47267–47285. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19104-2.
  99. Pan, J., Chen, Y., and Luo, H. (2025). Impact of Environmental Policy Stringency on Consumption-Based CO2: Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Top 11 GDP-Ranked Countries for EKC Hypothesis, SAGE Open, Vol. 15, No. 3. doi:10.1177/21582440251361637.
  100. Jóźwik, B., Gürsoy, S., and Doğan, M. (2023). Nuclear Energy and Financial Development for a Clean Environment: Examining the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Top Nuclear Energy-Consuming Countries, Energies, Vol. 16, No. 22, 7494. doi:10.3390/en16227494.
  101. Zhang, J. (2021). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis on CO2 Emissions: Evidence for China, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, 93. doi:10.3390/jrfm14030093.
  102. Bisset, T. (2023). N-Shaped EKC in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Three-Dimensional Effects of Governance Indices and Renewable Energy Consumption, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 3321–3334. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22394-1.
  103. Jiang, L., He, S., Zhong, Z., Zhou, H., and He, L. (2019). Revisiting Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Dioxide Emissions: The Role of Trade, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 50, 245–257. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.004.
  104. Nica, I., Georgescu, I., and Kinnunen, J. (2025). Economic Growth, Innovation, and CO2 Emissions: Analyzing the Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Innovation Claudia Curve in BRICS Countries, Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 8, 3507. doi:10.3390/su17083507.
  105. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., and Farhani, S. (2018). How Economic Growth, Renewable Electricity and Natural Resources Contribute to CO2 Emissions?, Energy Policy, Vol. 113, 356–367. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050.
  106. Nica, I., Georgescu, I., and Kinnunen, J. (2024). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag and Environmental Kuznets Curve Approach: Linking CO2 Emissions and Electricity Access in India, Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 24, 11278. doi:10.3390/su162411278.
  107. Gravina, A. F., and Lanzafame, M. (2025). ‘What’s Your Shape?’ A Data-Driven Approach to Estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Energy Economics, Vol. 148, 108649. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108649.
  108. Kumar, P., Radulescu, M., Sharma, H., Belascu, L., and Serbu, R. (2024). Pollution Haven Hypothesis and EKC Dynamics: Moderating Effect of FDI. A Study in Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries, Environmental Research Communications, Vol. 6, No. 11, 115032. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ad9381.
  109. Wang, W., Ali, A., Wang, H., Feng, Y., and Dai, S. (2023). EKC Hypothesis Testing and Environmental Impacts of Transportation Infrastructure Investments in China, Turkey, India, and Japan, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 34, 81600–81615. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-27580-3.
  110. Ajmi, A. N., Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D. K., and Sato, J. R. (2015). On the Relationships between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Income: The Importance of Time Variation, Energy Economics, Vol. 49, 629–638. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.02.007.
  111. Ali, A., Radulescu, M., and Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). A Dynamic Relationship between Renewable Energy Consumption, Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from Asian Emerging Economies, Energy & Environment, Vol. 34, No. 8, 3529–3552. doi:10.1177/0958305X231151684.
  112. Hatmanu, M., Cautisanu, C., and Iacobuta, A. O. (2022). On the Relationships between CO2 Emissions and Their Determinants in Romania and Bulgaria. An ARDL Approach, Applied Economics, Vol. 54, No. 22, 2582–2595. doi:10.1080/00036846.2021.1998328.
  113. Le, D. N. (2019). Environmental Degradation and Economic Growth in ASEAN-10: The Perspective of EKC Hypothesis, Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 43–62. doi:10.22452/MJES.vol56no1.3.
  114. Yasmeen, R., Yao, X., Ul Haq Padda, I., Shah, W. U. H., and Jie, W. (2022). Exploring the Role of Solar Energy and Foreign Direct Investment for Clean Environment: Evidence from Top 10 Solar Energy Consuming Countries, Renewable Energy, Vol. 185, 147–158. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.048.
  115. Achuo, E., and Ojong, N. (2025). Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Africa: Revisiting the Pollution Haven and Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypotheses, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 52, No. 4, 673–691. doi:10.1108/JES-02-2024-0065.
  116. Kang, Y.-Q., Zhao, T., and Yang, Y.-Y. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions in China: A Spatial Panel Data Approach, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 63, 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.011.
  117. Wang, Y., and He, X. (2019). Spatial Economic Dependency in the Environmental Kuznets Curve of Carbon Dioxide: The Case of China, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 218, 498–510. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.318.
  118. de Angelis, E. M., Di Giacomo, M., and Vannoni, D. (2019). Climate Change and Economic Growth: The Role of Environmental Policy Stringency, Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 8, 2273. doi:10.3390/su11082273.
  119. Alshubiri, F., and Elheddad, M. (2019). Foreign Finance, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions Nexus in OECD Countries, International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, 161–181. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-12-2018-0082.
  120. Lunku, H. S., Li, Z., Yang, S., Shayo, A., and Ngoma, J. B. (2024). The Dynamics of Deforestation in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Impact of Environmental Policy and Foreign Direct Investment on Forest Conversion, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 169, 103342. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103342.
  121. Ahmad, N., Du, L., Tian, X.-L., and Wang, J. (2019). Chinese Growth and Dilemmas: Modelling Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Growth in China, Quality & Quantity, Vol. 53, No. 1, 315–338. doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0755-0.
  122. Usama, A., Solarin, S. A., and Salahuddin, M. (2020). The Prominence of Renewable and Non-Renewable Electricity Generation on the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Case Study of Ethiopia, Energy, Vol. 211, 118665. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118665.
  123. Nguyen, A.-T., Lu, S.-H., and Nguyen, P. T. T. (2021). Validating and Forecasting Carbon Emissions in the Framework of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Case of Vietnam, Energies, Vol. 14, No. 11, 3144. doi:10.3390/en14113144.
  124. Ojaghlou, M., Ugurlu, E., Kadłubek, M., and Thalassinos, E. (2023). Economic Activities and Management Issues for the Environment: An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT Analysis in Turkey, Resources, Vol. 12, No. 5, 57. doi:10.3390/resources12050057.
  125. Yazici, A. M., Udemba, E. N., Öztirak, M., Bayram, V., and Mei, Y. (2025). Pathway to Energy Transition and Sustainable Environmental Development and Management: Analysis of Hydropower Energy Policy as Part of Climate Actions, Renewable Energy, Vol. 242, 122293. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2024.122293.
  126. Our World in Data (OWID). (2024). CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, from https://ourworldindata.org/#entries.
  127. World Development Indicators. (2024). WorldBank Development Indicator Databased, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#.
  128. Our World in Data (OWID). (2024). Renewable Energy, from https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy.
  129. OWID. (2025). Our World in Data - Fossil Fuels, from https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels.
  130. Brock, W. A., and Taylor, M. S. (2010). The Green Solow Model, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 15, No. 2, 127–153. doi:10.1007/s10887-010-9051-0.
  131. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 289–326. doi:10.1002/jae.616.
  132. Guevara-Segarra, M. F., Guevara-Segarra, M. G., Quinde-Pineda, A. P., and Guerrero-Vásquez, L. F. (2025). Capital Formation and Oil Consumption Drive CO2 Emissions in Ecuador: Evidence from an ARDL Model in Log-First Differences, Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 17, 7771. doi:10.3390/su17177771.
  133. Adebayo, T. S., Akadiri, S. Saint, Altuntaş, M., and Awosusi, A. A. (2023). Environmental Effects of Structural Change, Hydro and Coal Energy Consumption on Ecological Footprint in India: Insights from the Novel Dynamic ARDL Simulation, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 25, No. 12, 14309–14332. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02665-0.
  134. Idroes, G. M., Hafizah, I., Hartono, D., Dharma, D. B., Hardi, I., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2025). Investigating Hydropower Energy Consumption’s Effect on Southeast Asia’s Path to Achieving Environmental Sustainability and Carbon Neutrality, Carbon Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 57. doi:10.1007/s44246-025-00218-4.
  135. Hardi, I., Ray, S., Duwal, N., Idroes, G. M., and Mardayanti, U. (2024). Consumer Confidence and Economic Indicators: A Macro Perspective, Indatu Journal of Management and Accounting, Vol. 2, No. 2, 81–95. doi:10.60084/ijma.v2i2.241.
  136. Farooq, U., Paul, M., and Dar, A. B. (2024). On the Nexus between Growth and Disaggregated Ecological Footprints-Empirical Evidence from India, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 67, No. 7, 1461–1493. doi:10.1080/09640568.2023.2171279.
  137. Södersten, C., Wood, R., and Hertwich, E. G. (2018). Environmental Impacts of Capital Formation, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 55–67. doi:10.1111/jiec.12532.
  138. Maulidar, P., Fitriyani, F., Sasmita, N. R., Hardi, I., and Idroes, G. M. (2024). Exploring Indonesia’s CO2 Emissions: The Impact of Agriculture, Economic Growth, Capital and Labor, Grimsa Journal of Business and Economics Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 43–55. doi:10.61975/gjbes.v1i1.22.
  139. Idroes, G. M., Hafizah, I., Hartono, D., Dharma, D. B., Hardi, I., Noviandy, T. R., and Idroes, R. (2025). Investigating Hydropower Energy Consumption’s Effect on Southeast Asia’s Path to Achieving Environmental Sustainability and Carbon Neutrality, Carbon Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 57. doi:10.1007/s44246-025-00218-4.
  140. Anwar, N., and Elfaki, K. E. (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation in Indonesia: Do Capital and Trade Openness Matter?, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, Vol. 10, No. 4, 769–778. doi:10.14710/ijred.2021.37822.
  141. Wang, Z., and Xu, R. (2024). Nexus of Natural Resources, Renewable Energy, Capital Formation, Urbanization, and Foreign Investment in E7 Countries, Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 24, 11290. doi:10.3390/su162411290.
  142. Chekouri, S. M., Chibi, A., and Benbouziane, M. (2023). The Impact of Natural Resource Abundance on Ecological Footprint: Evidence from Algeria, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 26, 69289–69306. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26720-z.
  143. Aderinto, E. R., and Ogunro, T. T. (2021). Population Growth and Environmental Degradation in Nigeria: A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Ecological Footprint, Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied and Basics Subjects, Vol. 1, No. 4, 26.
  144. Usman, M., Makhdum, M. S. A., and Kousar, R. (2021). Does Financial Inclusion, Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Utilization Accelerate Ecological Footprints and Economic Growth? Fresh Evidence from 15 Highest Emitting Countries, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 65, 102590. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590.
  145. Saqib, N. (2022). Green Energy, Non-Renewable Energy, Financial Development and Economic Growth with Carbon Footprint: Heterogeneous Panel Evidence from Cross-Country, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 35, No. 1, 6945–6964. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054454.
  146. Dogan, E., Majeed, M. T., and Luni, T. (2022). Revisiting the Nexus of Ecological Footprint, Unemployment, and Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy for South Asian Economies: Evidence from Novel Research Methods, Renewable Energy, Vol. 194, 1060–1070. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.165.
  147. Ameyaw, B., and Yao, L. (2018). Analyzing the Impact of GDP on CO2 Emissions and Forecasting Africa’s Total CO2 Emissions with Non-Assumption Driven Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory, Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 9, 3110. doi:10.3390/su10093110.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Idroes, G. M., Fakher, H. A., Hilal, I. S. and Wiranatakusuma, D. B. (2026) “N-Shaped or Inverted N-Shaped EKC? The Role of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy in Environmental Sustainability”, Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, 4(1), pp. 58–87. doi: 10.60084/eje.v4i1.400.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): April 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ghalieb Mutig Idroes, Hossein Ali Fakher, Iin Shabrina Hilal, Dimas Bagus Wiranatakusuma

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.