Beyond Morphology: COI-Based Molecular Identification of Sea Urchins from Kumu Beach, North Sulawesi

Authors

  • Nur Aisyah Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia
  • Trina Ekawati Tallei Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia
  • Beivy Jonathan Kolondam Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/hjas.v4i2.451

Keywords:

COI Gene, Gene Sequence Alignment, Tripneustes gratilla, Phylogenetic

Abstract

Sea urchins (Echinoidea) play important ecological and economic roles in coastal ecosystems, but morphological identification is often unreliable due to overlapping diagnostic traits among closely related taxa. This study used DNA barcoding of the mitochondrial COI gene to identify a sea urchin specimen from Kumu Beach, North Sulawesi, and determine its phylogenetic relationship with GenBank reference sequences. DNA was extracted from gonad tissue, amplified via PCR using the BK-COI-AntF&AntR primers, sequenced, and analyzed through BLAST, MUSCLE alignment, and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction (Kimura 2 Parameter model, 1000 bootstrap replications). PCR yielded a clear ~709 bp fragment, producing a 658 bp COI consensus sequence (A+T content: 56.84%). BLAST analysis showed 100% query cover and identity with multiple Tripneustes gratilla reference sequences, and phylogenetic analysis placed the specimen within the Tripneustes clade, closely nested among T. gratilla sequences. These results confirm the specimen as T. gratilla and support COI based DNA barcoding as a reliable method for sea urchin species identification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Fong, C. R., Smith, N., Catalan, E., Caraveo, B. A., Barber, P. H., and Fong, P. (2024). Herbivorous Sea Urchins (Echinometra Mathaei) Support Resilience on Overfished and Sedimented Tropical Reefs, Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, 3829. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52222-0.
  2. MOHD YUSOP, S. ‘AINNUR N., Ishak, S. D., ROMLI, R., CHEAH, W., and MOHD FAHMI, A. D. (2025). A Review of the Nutritional Significance of Edible Sea Urchin Gonads: Composition, Variability and Implications for Aquaculture, Planetary Sustainability, Vol. 3, No. 2. doi:10.46754/ps.2025.07.005.
  3. Moore, A. M., Tassakka, A. C. M., Ambo-Rappe, R., Yasir, I., Smith, D. J., and Jompa, J. (2019). Unexpected Discovery of Diadema Clarki in the Coral Triangle, Marine Biodiversity, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2381–2399. doi:10.1007/s12526-019-00978-4.
  4. Reverter, M., Jackson, M., Rohde, S., Moeller, M., Bara, R., Lasut, M. T., Segre Reinach, M., and Schupp, P. J. (2021). High Taxonomic Resolution Surveys and Trait-Based Analyses Reveal Multiple Benthic Regimes in North Sulawesi (Indonesia), Scientific Reports, 16554. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95905-8.
  5. Tompolumiu, J. P., Roring, V. I. Y., Ogi, N. L. I. M., and Lawalata, H. J. (2023). Keanekaragaman Echinodermata Di Pantai Ranowangko II Kecamatan Kombi Kabupaten Minahasa, Indonesian Biodiversity Journal, 21–29.
  6. Nurdiansah, D., Ibrahim, P. S., Murni, I. A. A. D., Sumarwan, J., and Supono, S. (2024). Gonadosomatic Index and Distribution of Some Edible Sea Urchins in North Sulawesi Waters, Indonesia, AACL Bioflux, 897–904.
  7. Tamti, H., Ambo-Rappe, R., Andy Omar, S. B., Budimawan, Iqram, M., Renema, W., and Moore, A. M. (2023). Sea Urchin Utilisation in Eastern Indonesia, ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, 231–240. doi:10.14710/ik.ijms.28.3.231-240.
  8. Yusron, E. (2023). Keanekaragaman Jenis Ekhinodermata Di Perairan Likupang, Minahasa Utara, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, 1422–1433.
  9. Leung, J. Y. S., Connell, S. D., and Russell, B. D. (2025). Morphological Adjustments Enable Sea Urchins to Sustain Calcified Structure Function under Ocean Acidification, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 20251893. doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.1893.
  10. Korshunova, T., and Martynov, A. (2024). The Phyloperiodic Approach Removes the “Cryptic Species” and Puts Forward Multilevel Organismal Diversity, Diversity, 220. doi:10.3390/d16040220.
  11. Pinna, F., Fois, N., Mura, F., Ruiu, A., and Ceccherelli, G. (2024). Predation Risk of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus Lividus Juveniles in an Overfished Area Reveal System Stability Mechanisms and Restocking Challenges, PLOS ONE, e0301143. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301143.
  12. Wakayama, N., Kiyono, Y., Matsumoto, N., Saitoh, M., and Kanazawa, K. (2019). Effective DNA Extraction Methods for Mitochondrial Phylogenomics of the Sea Urchins, Zoosymposia, 192–202. doi:10.11646/zoosymposia.15.1.20.
  13. Aulia, E. D., Muzaki, F. K., Lee, S. K., Khim, J. S., and Park, J. (2025). DNA Barcoding Insights into Echinoderms from Situbondo Coral Reefs, East Java, Indonesia, Biodiversitas, 3434–3445. doi:10.13057/biodiv/d260734.
  14. Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT, Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 95–98.
  15. Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., and Green, P. (1998). Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment, Genome Research, 175–185. doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175.
  16. Crossley, B. M., Bai, J., Glaser, A., Maes, R., Porter, E., Killian, M. L., Clement, T., and Toohey-Kurth, K. (2020). Guidelines for Sanger Sequencing and Molecular Assay Monitoring, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 767–775. doi:10.1177/1040638720905833.
  17. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, Journal of Molecular Biology, 403–410. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.
  18. Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput, Nucleic Acids Research, 1792–1797. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340.
  19. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates, Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 294–299.
  20. Majeske, A. J., Mercado Capote, A. J., Komissarov, A., Bogdanova, A., Schizas, N. V, Castro Márquez, S. O., Hilkert, K., Wolfsberger, W., and Oleksyk, T. K. (2022). The First Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Diadema Antillarum (Diadematoida, Diadematidae), GigaByte, gigabyte73. doi:10.46471/gigabyte.73.
  21. Sun, S., Xiao, N., and Sha, Z. (2022). Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Four Deep-Sea Echinoids: Conserved Mitogenome Organization and New Insights into the Phylogeny and Evolution of Echinoidea, PeerJ, e13730. doi:10.7717/peerj.13730.
  22. Bronstein, O., Kroh, A., Tautscher, B., Liggins, L., and Haring, E. (2017). Cryptic Speciation in Pan-Tropical Sea Urchins: A Case Study of an Edge-of-Range Population of Tripneustes from the Kermadec Islands, Scientific Reports, 5948. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06183-2.
  23. Lessios, H. A., Kane, J., and Robertson, D. R. (2003). Phylogeography of the Pantropical Sea Urchin Tripneustes: Contrasting Patterns of Population Structure between Oceans, Evolution, 2026–2036. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00382.x.
  24. Liggins, L., Gleeson, L., and Riginos, C. (2014). Evaluating Edge-of-Range Genetic Patterns for Tropical Echinoderms, Acanthaster Planci and Tripneustes Gratilla, of the Kermadec Islands, Southwest Pacific, Bulletin of Marine Science, 379–397. doi:10.5343/bms.2013.1015.
  25. Felsenstein, J. (1981). Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 368–376. doi:10.1007/BF01734359.
  26. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096.
  27. Abidin, N., Mogea, R. A., and Binur, R. (2021). Philogenetics of Sea Urchin Tripneustes Gratilla Using Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit 1 Gene, Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 273–284. doi:10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2021.Vol.5.No.3.162.
  28. Fitch, W. M. (1971). Toward Defining the Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specific Tree Topology, Systematic Biology, 406–416. doi:10.1093/sysbio/20.4.406.
  29. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987). The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 406–425. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454.
  30. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., and Kumar, S. (2021). MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3022–3027. doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Aisyah, N., Tallei, T. E. and Kolondam, B. J. (2026) “Beyond Morphology: COI-Based Molecular Identification of Sea Urchins from Kumu Beach, North Sulawesi”, Heca Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(2), pp. 133–141. doi: 10.60084/hjas.v4i2.451.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): September 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Aisyah, Trina Ekawati Tallei, Beivy Jonathan Kolondam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.