Developing Digital Microlearning Content on Reaction Rates Using Wix for Senior High School

Authors

  • Sari Nur Fajriah Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Maria Paristiowati Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Elsa Vera Nanda Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v3i1.281

Keywords:

Reaction rate learning, Submicroscopic representations, Wix-based microlearning

Abstract

Reaction rate concepts in high school often lack submicroscopic depth and are not supported by digital media that match Generation Z's preferences for interactive learning. This study developed a Wix-based microlearning platform for 11th-grade students featuring videos, infographics, quizzes, worksheets, games, and modules. Using the ADDIE model, the platform was evaluated by experts and tested in the classroom. Expert validation showed high feasibility (91.94% from content and language experts, 90.40% from media experts). Large-scale trials with students and teachers also yielded high acceptance (93.25% and 93.23%, respectively). These findings support the platform’s feasibility and effectiveness in enhancing chemistry learning, especially for teaching reaction rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Dunlop, L., Hodgson, A., and Stubbs, J. E. (2020). Building Capabilities in Chemistry Education: Happiness and Discomfort through Philosophical Dialogue in Chemistry, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol. 21, No. 1, 438–451. doi:10.1039/C9RP00141G.
  2. Handayanti, Y., Setiabudi, A., and Nahadi, N. (2015). Analisis Profil Model Mental Siswa Sma Pada Materi Laju Reaksi, Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, Vol. 1, No. 1, 107. doi:10.30870/jppi.v1i1.329.
  3. Musya’idah, E., and Santoso, A. (2016). POGIL, Analogi Model FAR, KBI, Dan Laju Reaksi, Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, Semarang, 671–680.
  4. Sabilla, Z., Ridwan, A., and Yusmaniar, Y. (2019). Hubungan Antara Pemahaman Konsep Dengan Beban Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam, JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, Vol. 9, No. 1, 46–51. doi:10.21009/JRPK.091.06.
  5. Hasanah, N., Ajie, D. P., and Sufiati, V. (2021). Penggunaan Media Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Di Pos Paud Permata, UPY Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 17–22.
  6. Javorcik, T. (2021). Content Management System for Creating Microlearning Courses, 2021 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 223–227. doi:10.1109/ISET52350.2021.00053.
  7. Lukum, A. (2019). Pendidikan 4.0 Di Era Generasi Z: Tantangan Dan Solusinya, Pros. Semnas KPK (Vol. 2).
  8. Alsheri, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of a Micro-Learning Strategy in Developing the Skills of Using Augmented Reality Applications among Science Teachers in Jeddah, International Journal of Educational Research Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, 176–183. doi:10.24331/ijere.869642.
  9. Jannah, F., Irtifa’ Fathuddin, T., and Azzahra, P. F. (2022). Problematika Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar 2022, Al YAZIDIY: Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Pendidikan, Vol. 4, No. 2, 55–65.
  10. Gustanu, P., Surachmi, S., and Setiadi, G. (2023). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Quiz-Quizizz Sebagai Media Pembelajaran IPAS Kelas IV dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di SDN Wonorejo 1 Kabupaten Kediri, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol. 7, No. 1, 3543–3550.
  11. Pertiwi, P. D., Novaliyosi, N., Nindiasari, H., and Sukirwan, S. (2023). Analisis Kesiapan Guru Matematika Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka, JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan.
  12. Gherman, O., Turcu, C. E., and Octavian Turcu, C. (2022). An Approach to Adaptive Microlearning in Higher Education, ArXiv E-Prints, arXiv:2205.06337. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.06337.
  13. Calixtro, L. A. (2023). Effectiveness of Microlearning-Based Lessons in Teaching Grade 9 Chemistry, Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, 351–356.
  14. Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., and Blanchard, C. (2021). A Review of the Trend of Microlearning, Journal of Work-Applied Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, 88–102. doi:10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044.
  15. Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., and Naworly, S. S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Microlearning to Improve Students’ Learning Ability, International Journal of Educational Research Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, 32–38. doi:10.24331/ijere.415824.
  16. Sekarningsih, F., Budiman, A., and Gustiaji, G. R. (2021). Wix Web-Based Dance Learning Media to Support Teaching in The Pandemic Era in High School, Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 178–191. doi:10.15294/harmonia.v21i1.27420.
  17. Umamah, C., Diraya, I., and Andi, H. J. (2023). The Effectiveness and Practicality of Web-Based Learning Media with Wix Platform in Vocational High Schools, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, Vol. 11, No. 1, 115–126. doi:10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9720.
  18. Cahyadi, A. T. (2022). Design of Website for Business Enterprises Using a Website Creation Application, Visualita Jurnal Online Desain Komunikasi Visual, Vol. 10, No. 02, 11. doi:10.34010/visualita.v10i02.6562.
  19. Buchem, I., and Hamelmann, H. (2010). Microlearning: A Strategy for Ongoing Professional Development, ELearning Papers.
  20. Gay, L. R. (1991). Educational Evaluation and Measurement: Com-Petencies for Analysis and Application. (2nd ed.), Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
  21. Allela, M. (2021). Introduction to Microlearning, (B. Ogange & S. Mishra, Eds.), Commonwealth of Learning (COL), Burnaby.
  22. Tijmstra, J., and Bolsinova, M. (2025). Modeling Within- and Between-Person Differences in the Use of the Middle Category in Likert Scales, Applied Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/01466216251322285.
  23. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif, Dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.
  24. Andava, S. P., and Reinita. (2023). PBL-Based Electronic Teaching Materials Using Flip PDF Corporate in Elementary Schools, Journal of Education Action Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 429–437. doi:10.23887/jear.v7i3.67328.
  25. Allela, M. (2018). Guidelines and Standards for Design and Integration of Microlearning Content, Commonwealth of Learning.
  26. Achmaliya, N., Rosilawati, I., and Sunyono. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Representasi Kimia Pada Materi Teori Tumbukan, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, Vol. 5, No. 1, 114–127.
  27. Milenković, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., Hrin, T. N., and Cvjetićanin, S. (2014). Cognitive Load at Different Levels of Chemistry Representations / Kognitivno Opterećenje Na Razliitim Razinama Kemijskih Prikaza, Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Asopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje.
  28. Safitri, N. C., Nursaadah, E., and Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis Multipel Representasi Kimia Siswa Pada Konsep Laju Reaksi, EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), Vol. 4, No. 1, 1. doi:10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023.
  29. Waruwu, A. B. C., and Sitinjak, D. (2022). Penggunaan Multimedia Interaktif Dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Kimia, Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, Vol. 12, No. 2, 298–305. doi:10.37630/jpm.v12i2.589.
  30. Mewengkang, A., Rampe, M. J., and Palilingan, S. C. (2020). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Video Animasi Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Laju Reaksi, Oxygenius Journal Of Chemistry Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 29. doi:10.37033/ojce.v2i1.143.
  31. Choudhary, H., and Pandita, D. (2024). Maximizing Learning Outcomes in the Digital Age: The Role of Microlearning for Gen Z, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, 15–18. doi:10.1108/DLO-02-2023-0038.
  32. Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., and Cheng, X. (2025). Digital Learning in the 21st Century: Trends, Challenges, and Innovations in Technology Integration, Frontiers in Education, Vol. 10. doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391.
  33. Gultom, A. D., Napitupulu, R. P., and Simarmata, R. K. (2023). The Influence of Audio Visual Media on Student Learning Outcomes Sub Theme 1 Learning Weather Conditions 1 Grade III SD 097320 Serapuh T.A 2023/2024, International Journal of Global Sustainable Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 201–208. doi:10.59890/ijgsr.v1i2.645.
  34. R. N. Santi, R. Situmorang, and T. Iriani. (2024). Potensi Model Microlearning Sebagai Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Untuk Bahan Pembelajaran: Systematic Review, Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1–12.
  35. Sathiyaseelan, B., Mathew, J., and Nair, S. (2024). Microlearning and Learning Performance in Higher Education: A Post-Test Control Group Study, Journal of Learning for Development, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1–14. doi:10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.752.
  36. Meissner, B., and Bogner, F. (2013). Towards Cognitive Load Theory as Guideline for Instructional Design in Science Education, World Journal of Education, Vol. 3, No. 2. doi:10.5430/wje.v3n2p24.
  37. Peters, K. R. (2022). The Definitife Guide to Microlearning, (J. Kalinkina & N. Canton, Eds.), USA.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Fajriah, S. N., Paristiowati, M., & Nanda, E. V. (2025). Developing Digital Microlearning Content on Reaction Rates Using Wix for Senior High School. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 3(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v3i1.281

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): May 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sari Nur Fajriah, Maria Paristiowati, Elsa Vera Nanda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.