Institutional Barriers and Strategic Enablers: A Knowledge Management Scale Development Study in Indonesian Higher Education

Authors

  • Risana Rachmatan Graduate School of Mathematics and Applied Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111 Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syamsul Maarif School of Business, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia; Institut Kesenian Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 10330, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Adam Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Hizir Sofyan Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111 Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.369

Keywords:

KM scale development, Psychometric instrument development, Expert panel assessment, Content validity index, Content validity ratio

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important for Indonesian universities, which face rapid technological change and heightened demands for transparency, quality, and competitiveness. This study developed and validated a measurement instrument to identify key barriers and enablers of KM implementation in Indonesian higher education. A 22-item scale was developed for the local context and organized into six aspects: trust in individuals, trust in management, reward system, organizational process, IT, and technical support. The scale was produced in two versions: one for lecturers/education staff and one for students. Content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and the Content Validity Index (CVI) with expert panels (eight raters), followed by a pilot administration to 60 respondents (30 lecturers/staff and 30 students). The scale demonstrated strong content validity (mean I-CVI 0.87–0.91), acceptable item discrimination (lecturer/staff: 0.471–0.834; student: 0.250–0.785), and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.952 for lecturer/staff; 0.923 for students). These results indicate that the instrument is robust for diagnosing KM enablers and barriers in Indonesian universities and can support targeted policies and interventions. Future studies should expand validation across diverse institutions nationwide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Pinto, M. (2014). Knowledge Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Framework to Improve Collaboration, Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI, No. August. doi:10.1109/CISTI.2014.6876876.
  2. Sopandi, O. D., and Sa’ud, U. S. (2016). Implementasi Knowledge Management Pada Perguruan Tinggi, Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, Vol. 13, No. 2.
  3. Bano, Y., Omar, S. S., and Ismail, F. (2020). The Critical Link Between Knowledge Management and Succession Management at Higher Education Institutions, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3588158.
  4. Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge Management in Organizations: Examining the Interaction between Technologies, Techniques, and People, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, 68–75. doi:10.1108/13673270110384419.
  5. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., and Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, 43.
  6. Baptista Nunes, J. M., Kanwal, S., and Arif, M. (2017). Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review.
  7. Quarchioni, S., Paternostro, S., and Trovarelli, F. (2022). Knowledge Management in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Further Research Avenues, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol. 20, No. 2, 304–319. doi:10.1080/14778238.2020.1730717.
  8. Vyas, P. (2024). Knowledge Management and Higher Education Institute: Review & Topic Analysis, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 10, No. 3, 100349. doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100349.
  9. Nunes, J. M. B., Kanwal, S., and Arif, M. (2017). Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review, World Library and Information Congress (WLIC) Papers and Presentations, Vol. 4, 1–16.
  10. Fan, Z., and Beh, L.-S. (2024). Knowledge Sharing among Academics in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda, Educational Research Review, Vol. 42, 100573. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100573.
  11. Gustiawaty Dewi, F., Sarumpaet, S., and Rika Gamayuni, R. (n.d.). Remuneration, Organizational Commitment, and Performance in Indonesia State Universities: A Mixed Method Study, Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, Vol. 11, 204.
  12. Rohida, L., Irawati, I., Abdoellah, O. S., and Candradewini. (2024). The Impact of Remuneration to Performance in Public University in Indonesia, Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, Vol. 8, No. 3. doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3583.
  13. Shahzad, F., Chilba, S., and Arslan, A. (2024). Tacit Knowledge Exchange among Senior Management Educators: A Qualitative Study, The International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, 100973. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100973.
  14. Jin, X., Jin, S., and Qing, C. (2023). Expanding the Dimensions of Knowledge Hiding: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model and Analyzing the Mediating Role of Psychological Distress Using PLS-SEM, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. Volume 14-2023. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279964.
  15. Shen, Y., Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., and Cooke, F. L. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of Knowledge Hiding Behavior in Organizations: Antecedents, Consequences, and Boundary Conditions, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 186, 114963. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114963.
  16. Santos, E., Carvalho, M., and Martins, S. (2024). Sustainable Enablers of Knowledge Management Strategies in a Higher Education Institution, Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 12. doi:10.3390/su16125078.
  17. Figueiredo, E., Margaça, C., García, J. C. S., and Ribeiro, C. (2025). The Contribution of Reward Systems in the Work Context: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 16, No. 5, 16525–16559. doi:10.1007/s13132-024-02492-w.
  18. Raudeliūnienė, J., and Matar, I. (2025). Study of Knowledge Management Technologies Impact on Sustainable Higher Education Institutions Performance, Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-025-02617-9.
  19. Feng, J., Yu, B., Tan, W. H., Dai, Z., and Li, Z. (2025). Key Factors Influencing Educational Technology Adoption in Higher Education: A Systematic Review, PLOS Digital Health, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1–20. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000764.
  20. Romero-Ochoa, M.-A., Romero-González, J.-A., Perez-Soltero, A., Terven, J., García-Ramírez, T., Córdova-Esparza, D.-M., and Espinoza-Zallas, F.-A. (2025). Knowledge Management Strategies Supported by ICT for the Improvement of Teaching Practice: A Systematic Review, Information, Vol. 16, No. 5. doi:10.3390/info16050414.
  21. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., and Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer, Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. Volume 6-2018. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
  22. DeVellis, R. F., and Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Sage publications.
  23. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., and Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment, Psychology Press.
  24. Puspitasari, W. D., and Febrinita, F. (2021). Pengujian Validasi Isi (Content Validity) Angket Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Matakuliah Matematika Komputasi, Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), Vol. 4, No. 1, 77–90. doi:10.30762/factor_m.v4i1.3254.
  25. Sanaky, M. M. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Keterlambatan Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Asrama MAN 1 Tulehu Maluku Tengah, Jurnal Simetrik, Vol. 11, No. 1, 432–439. doi:10.31959/js.v11i1.615.
  26. Nengsih, N. R., Yusmaita, E., and Gazali, F. (2019). Evaluasi Validitas Konten Dan Konstruk Bahan Ajar Asam Basa Berbasis REACT, EduKimia, Vol. 1, No. 1. doi:10.24036/ekj.v1i1.104017.
  27. Widhiarso, W. (2010). Analisis Butir Dalam Pengembangan Pengukuran Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  28. C. H. Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 563–575.
  29. Santos, E., Carvalho, M., and Martins, S. (2024). Sustainable Enablers of Knowledge Management Strategies in a Higher Education Institution, Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 12. doi:10.3390/su16125078.
  30. Pircher, R., and Pausits, A. (2011). Information and Knowledge Management at Higher Education Institutions, Management Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 2, 008–016.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Rachmatan, R., Maarif, M. S., Adam, M., & Sofyan, H. (2026). Institutional Barriers and Strategic Enablers: A Knowledge Management Scale Development Study in Indonesian Higher Education. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.369