Enhancing Elementary Students’ Computational Thinking through 'Code4Kids' Coding-Based Worksheets

Authors

  • Rafni Fajriati Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia, Banda Aceh 23233, Indonesia
  • Martines Martines Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Rizki Julia Utama Computer Science Education, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia, Banda Aceh 23233, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.373

Keywords:

Problem-solving skills, Algorithmic reasoning, Primary school student, Technology-integrated learning, 21st century competencies

Abstract

This study investigates the early-stage development and feasibility of the Code4Kids worksheet, an unplugged coding-based instructional resource designed to enhance computational thinking (CT) and digital literacy among fourth-grade elementary students. An exploratory Research and Development (R&D) approach was employed, focusing on needs analysis, prototype development, and expert validation. Data were collected through classroom observations, teacher interviews, and structured expert evaluations to examine contextual readiness, instructional design alignment, and pedagogical suitability. The needs analysis revealed limited student digital literacy, insufficient structured CT materials, and low teacher confidence in implementing coding-related instruction. Based on these findings, a theory-informed worksheet prototype integrating decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking was developed. Expert validation results (mean score = 4.6/5) and positive teacher feedback indicate that the prototype is developmentally appropriate, pedagogically coherent, and feasible for classroom implementation in low-resource settings. The study concludes that unplugged, worksheet-based coding materials can serve as an accessible entry point for integrating CT in elementary education. These findings provide an empirical foundation for future classroom trials and broader implementation of the Code4Kids model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Chang, H. M., and Kim, H. J. (2021). Predicting the Pass Probability of Secondary School Students Taking Online Classes, Computers & Education, Vol. 164, 104110. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104110.
  2. Fajriati, R., Suri, M., and Qadrunnada, A. (2025). Digital Literacy in Learning At State Elementary School In Banda Aceh, Journal of Education Science (JES), Vol. 11, No. 1.
  3. Helsabeck, N. P., Justice, L. M., and Logan, J. A. R. (2022). Assessing Fidelity of Implementation to a Technology-Mediated Early Intervention Using Process Data, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 38, No. 2, 409–421. doi:10.1111/jcal.12621.
  4. Falloon, G. (2024). Advancing Young Students’ Computational Thinking: An Investigation of Structured Curriculum in Early Years Primary Schooling, Computers & Education, Vol. 216, 105045. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105045.
  5. Rizqiyati, I., and Wardani, A. (2023). Penelitian Teori Perkembangan Piaget Tahap Operasional Konkret Pada Usia 11-12 Tahun Terhadap Hukum Kekekalan Volume, PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Vol. 6, 634–638.
  6. Sherwood, H., Culp, K. M. M., Ferguson, C., Kaiser, A., Henry, M., and Negron, A. (2024). Teacher Practices for Formatively Assessing Computational Thinking with Early Elementary Learners, Education Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 11. doi:10.3390/educsci14111250.
  7. Xing, G. Y., and Cady, A. G. (n.d.). Playful Computational Thinking Learning in and Beyond Early Classrooms: Insights from Collaborative Action of Two Teacher-Researchers.
  8. Marito, W., and Riani, N. (2025). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Computational Thinking Siswa Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Lembar Aktivitas Unplugged Coding Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika, Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, 6110–6119. doi:10.54373/imeij.v6i4.3757.
  9. Dağ, F., Şumuer, E., and Durdu, L. (2023). The Effect of an Unplugged Coding Course on Primary School Students’ Improvement in Their Computational Thinking Skills, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1902–1918. doi:10.1111/jcal.12850.
  10. Kasiono, B., Pradhana, G., Huda, N., Utami, S., and Haerussaleh, H. (2025). Unlocking Young Minds : The Impact of Unplugged Coding on Elementary Students’ Computational Thinking, Jurnal Paedagogy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 754. doi:10.33394/jp.v12i3.15650.
  11. Rehder, M. M., Jensen, J. J., Møller, T. E., and Schrøder, V. (2024). Exploring the Potentials of Unplugged Activities—Developing Computational Thinking in Teacher Education, Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, Vol. 8, No. 4. doi:10.7577/njcie.5741.
  12. Fiş Erümit, S. (2024). Collaboration of Unplugged and Plugged Activities for Primary School Students: Developing Computational Thinking Skills with Programming, International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, Vol. 6, No. 3. doi:10.21585/ijcses.v6i3.173.
  13. Zakariya, Y. F., and Adegoke, N. A. (2024). Teacher Instructional Practices: Untangling Their Complex Relations with Self-Efficacy, Job Satisfaction, Stress, and Cooperation among Mathematics Teachers, Frontiers in Education, Vol. Volume 9-2024. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1367076.
  14. Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., and Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to Code and the Acquisition of Computational Thinking by Young Children, Computers & Education, Vol. 169, 104222. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222.
  15. Fiş Erümit, S. (2024). Collaboration of Unplugged and Plugged Activities for Primary School Students: Developing Computational Thinking Skills with Programming, International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, Vol. 6, No. 3. doi:10.21585/ijcses.v6i3.173.
  16. St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., and Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the Tipping Point for Integrating e-Assessment in Higher Education Practices, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 349–366. doi:10.1111/bjet.13169.
  17. Grant, D. (2023). “Or Is That Just Your Opinion?“: Incorporating Faculty of Color into the Foundational Literature on Learner-Centered Classrooms—A Review, Educational Research Review, Vol. 39, 100512. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512.
  18. Gustina, Z., Husnayayin, A., and Dewi, D. E. C. (2024). 95.+Zapia+Gustina, Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, No. 09.
  19. Ogegbo, A. A., and Ramnarain, U. (2022). A Systematic Review of Computational Thinking in Science Classrooms, Studies in Science Education, Routledge, 203–230. doi:10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580.
  20. Choiriyah, C., Pertiwi, L., Rohanah, R., and Valencia, E. (2025). Teacher’s Perspectives on Young Children’s Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Coding Activities, A Case Study of Children Aged 5-6 Years, Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 54–68. doi:10.15294/ijeces.v14i1.29613.
  21. Zakariya, Y. F., and Adegoke, N. A. (2024). Teacher Instructional Practices: Untangling Their Complex Relations with Self-Efficacy, Job Satisfaction, Stress, and Cooperation among Mathematics Teachers, Frontiers in Education, Vol. Volume 9-2024. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1367076.
  22. Goyanes, M., Lopezosa, C., and Jordá, B. (2025). Thematic Analysis of Interview Data with ChatGPT: Designing and Testing a Reliable Research Protocol for Qualitative Research, Quality & Quantity, Vol. 59, No. 6, 5491–5510. doi:10.1007/s11135-025-02199-3.
  23. Sherwood, H., Culp, K. M., Ferguson, C., Kaiser, A., Henry, M., and Negron, A. (2024). Teacher Practices for Formatively Assessing Computational Thinking with Early Elementary Learners, Education Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 11. doi:10.3390/educsci14111250.
  24. Misbahul Munir, M., Muhith, A., and Syamsul Arifin, A. (n.d.). Journal of Educational Research and Practice (JERP) The Effect of Scratch-Based Instructional Media on Grade 5 Elementary Students’ Coding Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study, Vol. 3. doi:10.70376/jerp.
  25. Liu, Z. (2023). Integrating Computational Thinking into K-12 Education: Bridging the Gap between Theories and Practices, STEM Education Review, Vol. 1. doi:10.54844/stemer.2023.0467.
  26. Xing, G. Y., Cady, A. G., and Wang, X. C. (2025). Playful Computational Thinking Learning in and Beyond Early Childhood Classrooms: Insights from Collaborative Action Research of Two Teacher-Researchers, Education Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 7. doi:10.3390/educsci15070840.
  27. Liu, Z., Gearty, Z., Richard, E., Orrill, C. H., Kayumova, S., and Balasubramanian, R. (2024, December 1). Bringing Computational Thinking into Classrooms: A Systematic Review on Supporting Teachers in Integrating Computational Thinking into K-12 Classrooms, International Journal of STEM Education, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00510-6.
  28. Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E. A., Michalakopoulos, C. A., Zygouris, N. C., and Bagos, P. G. (2025, August 1). Computational Thinking in Primary and Pre-School Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Education Sciences, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi:10.3390/educsci15080985.
  29. Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., and Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational Thinking in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: A Systematic Review, Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 27–49. doi:10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5.
  30. Hu, L., and Wang, H. (2024). Unplugged Activities in the Elementary School Mathematics Classroom: The Effects on Students’ Computational Thinking and Mathematical Creativity, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 54, 101653. doi:1016/j.tsc.2024.101653.
  31. Sun, L., Liu, J., and Liu, Y. (2024). Comparative Experiment of the Effects of Unplugged and Plugged-in Programming on Computational Thinking in Primary School Students: A Perspective of Multiple Influential Factors, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 52, 101542. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101542.
  32. Akiba, D. (2022). Computational Thinking and Coding for Young Children: A Hybrid Approach to Link Unplugged and Plugged Activities, Education Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 11. doi:10.3390/educsci12110793.
  33. Falloon, G. (2024). Advancing Young Students’ Computational Thinking: An Investigation of Structured Curriculum in Early Years Primary Schooling, Computers & Education, Vol. 216, 105045. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105045.
  34. Yang, Z., and Lee, Y.-Y. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities of Design-Based Research in Applied Linguistics: Insights from a Scoping Review, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 100178. doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100178.
  35. Liu, Z., Gearty, Z., Richard, E., Orrill, C. H., Kayumova, S., and Balasubramanian, R. (2024). Bringing Computational Thinking into Classrooms: A Systematic Review on Supporting Teachers in Integrating Computational Thinking into K-12 Classrooms, International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 51. doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00510-6.
  36. Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., and Trika Adi Ana, I. K. (2023). Elementary School Teachers’ Readiness in Teaching Technology-Based Literacy, International Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 7, No. 2, 299–310. doi:10.23887/ijee.v7i2.61675.
  37. Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., and Wang, X. (2023). Fostering Computational Thinking through Unplugged Activities: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 10, No. 1, 47. doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7.
  38. Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., and Wang, X. (2023, December 1). Fostering Computational Thinking through Unplugged Activities: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of STEM Education, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7.
  39. Tacoronte-Sosa, J. P., and Peña-Hita, M. Á. (2025). Design and Evaluation of a Serious Game Prototype to Stimulate Pre-Reading Fluency Processes in Paediatric Hospital Classrooms, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, Vol. 9, No. 9. doi:10.3390/mti9090090.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Fajriati, R., Martines, M., & Utama, R. J. (2026). Enhancing Elementary Students’ Computational Thinking through ’Code4Kids’ Coding-Based Worksheets. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 4(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.373