A Data-Driven Classification of Student Productivity Based on Academic Performance, Lifestyle Patterns, and Digital Habits

Authors

  • Teuku Rizky Noviandy Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Abulyatama, Aceh Besar 23372, Indonesia
  • Hizir Sofyan Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  • Yosza Dasril Faculty of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), 76100 Melaka, Malaysia
  • Rinaldi Idroes School of Mathematics and Applied Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.433

Keywords:

Educational data mining, Digital distraction, Student performance, Machine learning, Prediction

Abstract

Student productivity is influenced by various factors, including academic habits, lifestyle characteristics, and digital distraction behaviors. The increasing use of digital technologies, such as smartphones, social media, and online gaming, has created new challenges for maintaining student focus and academic performance. Therefore, understanding and predicting student productivity levels is important for supporting effective educational management and student success. This study aims to classify student productivity levels using machine learning techniques based on academic, behavioral, and digital distraction variables. The study utilized the Student Productivity & Digital Distraction Dataset obtained from Kaggle, consisting of 20,000 student records. The productivity score was transformed into five productivity categories, namely very low, low, medium, high, and very high productivity. Four machine learning algorithms, including Decision Tree (DT), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Random Forest (RF) were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix analysis. The results showed that RF achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 81.15%, precision of 81.35%, recall of 81.15%, and F1-score of 81.23%, outperforming GB, DT, and KNN. The findings indicate that ensemble learning methods are more effective in modeling the complex relationships among academic habits, lifestyle factors, digital distraction, and student productivity. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the potential of machine learning as a decision-support tool for educational management, enabling the identification of students with different productivity levels and supporting data-driven interventions to improve academic outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Khan, H., Gul, R., and Zeb, M. (2023). The Effect of Students’ Cognitive and Emotional Engagement on Students’ Academic Success and Academic Productivity, Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 322–334.
  2. Aljaffer, M. A., Almadani, A. H., AlDughaither, A. S., Basfar, A. A., AlGhadir, S. M., AlGhamdi, Y. A., AlHubaysh, B. N., AlMayouf, O. A., AlGhamdi, S. A., Ahmad, T., and Abdulghani, H. M. (2024). The Impact of Study Habits and Personal Factors on the Academic Achievement Performances of Medical Students, BMC Medical Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 888. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05889-y.
  3. Masnan, F., Abd Rani, M. J., Alias, N. S., Esquivias, M. A., Shaari, M. S., and Kustiningsih, N. (2025). The Role of Sense of Purpose, Time Management, Attendance, Sleep and Self-Esteem in Academic Performance among University Students in Malaysia, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Vol. 11, 101258. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101258.
  4. Fu, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Zhong, H., Chen, J., Fei, H., Yao, Y., Xiao, Y., Li, W., and Li, N. (2025). Unlocking Academic Success: The Impact of Time Management on College Students’ Study Engagement, BMC Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 323. doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02619-x.
  5. Martin, F., Long, S., Haywood, K., and Xie, K. (2025). Digital Distractions in Education: A Systematic Review of Research on Causes, Consequences and Prevention Strategies, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 73, No. 6, 3423–3451. doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10550-6.
  6. Dontre, A. J. (2021). The Influence of Technology on Academic Distraction: A Review, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, Vol. 3, No. 3, 379–390. doi:10.1002/hbe2.229.
  7. Gong, Z., Guo, Y., and Tan, J. (2025). Social Media Use and Academic Performance among College Students: The Chain Mediating Roles of Social Anxiety and Fear of Missing out and the Moderating Effect of Teacher-Student Relationship, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1649890.
  8. Zhao, L. (2023). Social Media Multitasking and College Students’ Academic Performance: A Situation–Organism–Behavior–Consequence Perspective, Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 60, No. 9, 3151–3168. doi:10.1002/pits.22912.
  9. Salari, N., Zarei, H., Rasoulpoor, S., Ghasemi, H., Hosseinian-Far, A., and Mohammadi, M. (2025). The Impact of Social Networking Addiction on the Academic Achievement of University Students Globally: A Meta-Analysis, Public Health in Practice, Vol. 9, 100584. doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100584.
  10. Dong, F., and Kula, M. C. (2025). Using Digital Devices for Fun: What Are the Impacts on Academic Outcomes?, Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 53, Nos. 1–2, 73–104. doi:10.1007/s11293-025-09825-3.
  11. Alzahrani, A. K. D., and Griffiths, M. D. (2025). Problematic Gaming and Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 23, No. 5, 4062–4095. doi:10.1007/s11469-024-01338-5.
  12. Issah, I., Appiah, O., Appiahene, P., and Inusah, F. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Machine Learning Application of Determining the Attributes Influencing Academic Performance, Decision Analytics Journal, Vol. 7, 100204. doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100204.
  13. Yağcı, M. (2022). Educational Data Mining: Prediction of Students’ Academic Performance Using Machine Learning Algorithms, Smart Learning Environments, Vol. 9, No. 1, 11. doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z.
  14. Alruwais, N., and Zakariah, M. (2023). Student-Engagement Detection in Classroom Using Machine Learning Algorithm, Electronics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 731. doi:10.3390/electronics12030731.
  15. Noviandy, T. R., Zahriah, Z., Yandri, E., Jalil, Z., Yusuf, M., Yusof, N. I. S. M., Lala, A., and Idroes, R. (2024). Machine Learning for Early Detection of Dropout Risks and Academic Excellence: A Stacked Classifier Approach, Journal of Educational Management and Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1, 28–34. doi:10.60084/jeml.v2i1.191.
  16. Hoffmann, F., Bertram, T., Mikut, R., Reischl, M., and Nelles, O. (2019). Benchmarking in Classification and Regression, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 9, No. 5. doi:10.1002/widm.1318.
  17. Preet, M. (2026, May 31). Student Productivity & Digital Distraction Dataset, Kaggle, Kaggle.
  18. Apicella, A., Isgrò, F., and Prevete, R. (2025). Don’t Push the Button! Exploring Data Leakage Risks in Machine Learning and Transfer Learning, Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 58, No. 11, 339. doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11326-3.
  19. Joseph, V. R. (2022). Optimal Ratio for Data Splitting, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, 531–538. doi:10.1002/sam.11583.
  20. Ahsan, M., Mahmud, M., Saha, P., Gupta, K., and Siddique, Z. (2021). Effect of Data Scaling Methods on Machine Learning Algorithms and Model Performance, Technologies, Vol. 9, No. 3, 52. doi:10.3390/technologies9030052.
  21. Romero, C., and Ventura, S. (2010). Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), Vol. 40, No. 6, 601–618. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2053532.
  22. Jung, A. (2022). Machine Learning: The Basics, Springer Nature.
  23. Kramer, O. (2016). Scikit-Learn, 45–53. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33383-0_5.
  24. Garan, M., and Tidriri, K. (2022). A Data-Centric Machine Learning Methodology : Application, 1–21.
  25. Fadlil, A., Herman, and Praseptian M, D. (2022). K Nearest Neighbor Imputation Performance on Missing Value Data Graduate User Satisfaction, Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), Vol. 6, No. 4, 570–576. doi:10.29207/resti.v6i4.4173.
  26. Suhendra, R., Suryadi, S., Husdayanti, N., Maulana, A., Noviandy, T. R., Sasmita, N. R., Subianto, M., Earlia, N., Niode, N. J., and Idroes, R. (2023). Evaluation of Gradient Boosted Classifier in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Score Classification, Heca Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 2, 54–61. doi:10.60084/hjas.v1i2.85.
  27. Noviandy, T. R., Idroes, G. M., and Hardi, I. (2024). Enhancing Loan Approval Decision-Making: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach Using LightGBM for Digital Economy Development, Malaysian Journal of Computing (MJOC), Vol. 9, No. 1, 1734–1745. doi:10.24191/mjoc.v9i1.25691.
  28. Tharwat, A. (2021). Classification Assessment Methods, Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 168–192. doi:10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Noviandy, T. R., Sofyan, H., Dasril, Y., & Idroes, R. (2026). A Data-Driven Classification of Student Productivity Based on Academic Performance, Lifestyle Patterns, and Digital Habits. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 4(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v4i1.433

Issue

Section

Articles