Augmented Reality and Student Learning: Analysis of Mental Models of Salt Hydrolysis at SMAN 51 Jakarta, Indonesia

Authors

  • Anisa Umayah Chemistry Education Department, Math dan Science Faculty, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No. 10, Rawamangun 13220, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Maria Paristiowati Chemistry Education Department, Math dan Science Faculty, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No. 10, Rawamangun 13220, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hanhan Dianhar Chemistry Education Department, Math dan Science Faculty, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No. 10, Rawamangun 13220, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nur Azizah Putri Hasibuan Chemistry Education Department, Education, and Teacher Training Faculty, UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan. Jl. H.T. Rizal Nurdin, KM 4.5, Padangsidimpuan City, 22733, North Sumatera. Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.53

Keywords:

Augmented reality, Mental model, Salt hydrolysis, Submicroscopic representations, Science education

Abstract

This study aimed to ascertain students' mental models while learning about salt hydrolysis through augmented reality (AR). The study comprised 36 participants from Public High School 51 in Jakarta. A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted for this research, employing various data collection methods such as written drawings, interviews, classroom observations, teacher notes, student worksheets, and final tests. In categorizing students' mental models, three main types emerged: scientific, synthetic, and initial mental models. The findings revealed that 7.20% of students fell into the initial mental model category, 53.90% exhibited synthetic mental models, and 38.90% demonstrated scientific mental models. Notably, incorporating AR into salt hydrolysis learning predominantly influenced the development of synthetic mental models. The study's results also indicated that the utilization of AR positively enhanced students' spatial abilities in understanding submicroscopic representations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Andina, R. E., Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A. (2019). Analysis of students’ mental model of salt hydrolysis concepts at Klaten, Central Java, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1157, 042009. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042009
  2. Latifah, S., Sugiharto, S., Saputro, A. N. C. (2014). Studi komparasi penggunaan praktikum dan demonstrasi pada metode problem solving terhadap prestasi belajar siswa materi hidrolisis garam kelas xi ilmu alam sma al islam 1 surakarta tahun pelajaran 2010/2011, Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, Vol. 3, No. 3, 111–120
  3. Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 25, No. 11, 1353–1368. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070306
  4. Hinton, M. E., Nakhleh, M. B. (1999). Students? Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions, The Chemical Educator, Vol. 4, No. 5, 158–167. doi:10.1007/s00897990325a
  5. Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models, International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 22, No. 9, 1011–1026. doi:10.1080/095006900416884
  6. COLL, R. K., TAYLOR, N. (2002). MENTAL MODELS IN CHEMISTRY: SENIOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS’ MENTAL MODELS OF CHEMICAL BONDING, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., Vol. 3, No. 2, 175–184. doi:10.1039/B2RP90014A
  7. Rouse, W. B., Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models., Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 100, No. 3, 349–363. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
  8. Chittleborough, G. (2004). The role of teaching models and chemical representations in developing students’ mental models of chemical phenomena, Curtin University
  9. Kurnaz, M. A., Emen, A. Y. (2014). Student Mental Models Related to Expansion and Contraction., Acta Didactica Napocensia, Vol. 7, No. 1, 59–67
  10. Maratusholihah, N. F., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa sma pada materi hidrolisis garam dan larutan penyangga, Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, Vol. 2, No. 7, 919–926
  11. Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., Idroes, R. (2023). Student Perspectives on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Survey-Based Analysis, Journal of Educational Management and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1, 8–15. doi:10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58
  12. Supriadi, S., Wildan, W., Siahaan, J., Muntari, M., Haris, M. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Teknologi Augmented Reality (AR) untuk Melatih Model Mental Siswa SMA di Daerah Geopark Rinjani, Chemistry Education Practice, Vol. 6, No. 1, 8–14
  13. Garzón, J. (2021). An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, Vol. 5, No. 7, 37
  14. Suryawinata, B. A. (2010). Pemanfaatan augmented reality dalam memvisualisasikan produk perumahan melalui internet, ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, Vol. 1, No. 2, 758–769
  15. Latipah, J., Jamilah, S. N., Sari, S. T. (2021). Analysis of student’s mental model through representation chemistry textbooks based on augmented reality, Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1760), IOP Publishing, 12050
  16. Sunyono, S., Sudjarwo, S. (2018). Mental models of atomic structure concepts of 11th grade chemistry students
  17. Amalia, F. R., Ibnu, S., Widarti, H. R., Wuni, H. (2018). Students’ Mental Models of Acid and Base Concepts Taught Using Cognitive Apprenticeship Learning Model, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, Vol. 7, No. 2, 187–192
  18. Supriadi, S., Ibnu, S., Yahmin, Y. (2018). Analisis model mental mahasiswa pendidikan kimia dalam memahami berbagai jenis reaksi kimia, Jurnal Pijar MIPA, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1–5
  19. Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage
  20. Diaz, C., Hincapié, M., Moreno, G. (2015). How the Type of Content in Educative Augmented Reality Application Affects the Learning Experience, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 75, 205–212. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.239
  21. Dewi, K. M., Suja, I. W., Sastrawidana, I. D. K. (2018). MODEL MENTAL SISWA TENTANG TERMOKIMIA, Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, Vol. 2, No. 2, 45. doi:10.23887/jjpk.v2i2.21165
  22. Whitten, K. H., Davis, R. E., Peck, M. L., Stanley, G. G. (2013). Chemistry 10th, United States of America: Cengage Learning

Downloads

Published

2023-08-18

How to Cite

Umayah, A., Paristiowati, M., Dianhar, H., & Hasibuan, N. A. P. (2023). Augmented Reality and Student Learning: Analysis of Mental Models of Salt Hydrolysis at SMAN 51 Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 1(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.53

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): August 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Anisa Umayah, Maria Paristiowati, Hanhan Dianhar, Nur Azizah Putri Hasibuan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.